Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05821868

Contrasting Dosivent With Plus Flow Vu Spacer in Bronchial Hyperreactivity Participants

This study aims to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC), of salbutamol inhaled with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive bronchodilator testing.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Madrid, 28007, Spain

About this study

The investigators are conducting a non-randomized, open-label, crossover-controlled clinical trial in 50 participants with a previous positive bronchodilation testing. The protocol was approved by the local clinical ethics committee (code 03/2022). All participants provided written informed consent before any study procedure. During the study, the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the current standards of Good Clinical Practice were followed.

Participants over 18 years of age are included who attended our center for a bronchodilator test, gave a positive result in this test, and provided written informed consent for participation in this study. Participants are excluded if grade A quality spirometry was not obtained according to the classification in current regulations and, in the opinion of the investigator, performing a bronchodilator test could pose a risk to the participant or interrupting the usual bronchodilator treatment could worsen the underlying respiratory pathology.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants over 18 years of age
  • Attending our center for a bronchodilator test
  • Positive bronchodilator result with increase of Forced Expiratory Volume in first second greater than 200 mililiters and 12%
  • Provided written informed consent for participation in this study

Exclusion criteria

  • Grade A quality spirometry was not obtained according to the classification in current regulation
  • Performing a bronchodilator test, in the opinion of the investigator, could pose a risk to the participant or interrupting the usual bronchodilator treatment could worsen the underlying respiratory pathology.

Treatment and study plan

Dosivent

Device

Dosivent® inhalation chamber is designed to optimize the delivery of inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids in the treatment of respiratory diseases

Aerochamber Plus Flow Vu

Device

Aerochamber Plus Flow Vu® inhalation chamber is also designed to optimize the delivery of inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids in the treatment of respiratory diseases

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of bronchodilator response in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in miliLiters between Dosivent® and Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® chambers in participants with bronchial hyperreactivity

    Time frame: 12 months

    This study aim is to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in mililiters of inhaled Salbutamol with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive Bronchodilator testing.

  2. Comparison of bronchodilator response in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in percentage between Dosivent® and Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® chambers in participants with bronchial hyperreactivity

    Time frame: 12 months

    This study aim is to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in percentage of inhaled salbutamol with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive Bronchodilator testing.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of bronchodilator response forced vital capacity (FVC) in miliLiters between Dosivent® and Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® chambers in participants with bronchial hyperreactivity

    Time frame: 12 months

    This study aim is to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) in mililiters,of inhaled Salbutamol with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive Bronchodilator testing.

  2. Comparison of bronchodilator response forced vital capacity (FVC) in percentage between Dosivent® and Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® chambers in participants with bronchial hyperreactivity

    Time frame: 12 months

    This study aim is to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) in percentage,of inhaled Salbutamol with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive Bronchodilator testing.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Contrasting Dosivent Spacer Device With Plus Flow Vu Spacer in Bronchial Hyperreactivity Participants

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Apr 20, 2023
Registry last updated
Sep 29, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.