Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06062992

Contrast-Enhanced Stereotactic Biopsy

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging breast imaging modality that is based on dual-energy mammography and the injection of iodinated contrast agent. A typical CEM study consists of a low-energy image (equal to a FFDM image) and a recombined image (in which areas of contrast enhancement can be appreciated). However, the situation can occur that lesions are visible only on the recombined (contrast) images (in this protocol defined as 'recombined-only lesions' or ROLs). In these cases, radiologists need to perform 'contrast-enhanced stereotactic biopsy' (CESB), in which CEM is used as a targeting modality.

However, experiences with CESB are still limited and one of the most urgent questions that need to be answered is the amount of tissue sampling that is required to reach a final diagnosis. The investigators aim to study where the cut off will be in terms of tissue sampling volume needed (i.e., number of biopsies) for a reliable diagnosis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Zuyderland Medical Center

Sittard, Limburg, 6162BG, Netherlands

About this study

Rationale: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging breast imaging modality that is based on dual-energy mammography and the injection of iodinated contrast agent. A typical CEM study consists of a low-energy image (equal to a FFDM image) and a recombined image (in which areas of contrast enhancement can be appreciated). However, the situation can occur that lesions are visible only on the recombined (contrast) images (in this protocol defined as 'recombined-only lesions' or ROLs). In these cases, radiologists need to perform 'contrast-enhanced stereotactic biopsy' (CESB), in which CEM is used as a targeting modality.

However, experiences with CESB are still limited and one of the most urgent questions that need to be answered is the amount of tissue sampling that is required to reach a final diagnosis. The investigators aim to study where the cut off will be in terms of tissue sampling volume needed (i.e., number of biopsies) for a reliable diagnosis.

Objective: To determine the minimum number of CESB-guided tissue samples needed to establish a final histopathological biopsy diagnosis for ROLs.

Study design: Prospective, single center, observational cohort study. Study population: Non-pregnant women (>18 years) able to provide written informed consent and with a ROL recently observed during a regular CEM examination.

Intervention: Included subject will undergo CESB, consisting of an intravenous injection of iodinated contrast agent prior to image acquisition. After administration, a contrast-enhanced stereotactic localization will be performed of the ROL to determine the location and depth of the lesion within the breast. After targeting, 18 samples will be acquired using a 9 Gauge vacuum-assistend biopsy (VAB), collected in six separate and numbered cassettes, to be able to determine the chronological order of the tissue sampling. Each specimen will be histologically analyzed in this chronological order and findings will be compared with the final histopathological result after assessment of all 18 specimens.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary study aim will be to calculate the cumulative diagnostic yield per specimen, enabling us to define a minimum number of biopsies required (or tissue volume needed) to establish a reliable diagnosis using CESB. Secondary study outcomes will be general parameters of the biopsy procedure itself, such as patient characteristics, histopathological results, pain experienced during the procedure, and complication rates (hematoma, infection).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women >18 years of age;
  • Recent detection of a ROL on CEM;
  • Able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • All men (male sex);
  • Women (female sex) who are contra indicated for CESB (for example: impaired renal function, known hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast);
  • Pregnant women.

Treatment and study plan

Contrast Enhanced Stereotactic Biopsy

Diagnostic Test

Stereotactic breast biopsy using CEM as targeting modality

Primary outcomes

  1. Amount of tissue needed for CESB

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators calculate the diagnostic yield per biopsy sample to establish to minimum amount of tissue samples needed for CESB

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complication rate

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will establish the complication rate of CESB (for example: hematoma, technical failures, infection)

  2. Diagnostic results

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will establish the various diagnostic outcomes (pathology results) of the biopsies performed using CESB

  3. Patient comfort

    Time frame: 2 years

    The investigators will establish the patient (dis)comfort of CESB by scoring the pain associated with this intervention on a 0-10 scale (0 no pain, 10 worst pain ever)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

Other

Collaborators

  • Hologic, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

Assessing the Optimal Amount of Tissue Sampling in Contrast-Enhanced Stereotactic Biopsy (CESB)

Acronym: CESB

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Oct 2, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.