Checkpoint Cardio wireless continuous monitoring device
DeviceContinuous monitoring of respiratory rate and heart rate
NCT Number: NCT06973044
Is heart rate and respiratory rate measured continuously with a new wireless sensor better as compared to standard care, with manually measured spot checks by nurses on general wards?
Does continuous monitoring detect more abnormal respiratory- and heart rate? Are abnormal values associated with increased lenght of stay?
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Tachypnea is not just a sign of ventilatory problems with hypoxia, but also a precursor of sepsis, metabolic acidosis and severe pain reflecting its role as an indicator of severe derangement in many body systems. A high respiratory rate has been shown to be the most reliable vital sign to predict clinical deterioration, cardiac arrest and is even associated with higher mortality rates. Despite this, it is the vital parameter most neglected; poorly documented or not recorded at all. Studies have shown that respiratory rate is measured in less than half of cases consequently jeopardizing patient safety. The lack of understanding why respiratory rate is important and its superiority to pulse oximetry in predicting clinical deterioration may be one of the reasons why it is not measured accurately.
Badawy and colleagues stated in their study "Is everyone really breathing 20 times a minute?" that respiratory rate was inaccurately recorded and had little variation in the recordings, even in patients with cardiopulmonary compromise, findings that's been supported with later studies. Respiratory rate has traditionally not been objectively measured in general wards, but instead calculated manually over 30 seconds or a minute. This could be changed by new wireless monitoring technology. A recent large study showed that continuous measured respiratory rate together with heart rate and age in a clinical deterioration model outperformed traditional early warning scores in predicting ICU admission.
The present study evaluates heart rate and respiratory rate measured continuously with a new wireless sensor as compared to standard care, with manually measured spot checks by nurses on general wards.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Continuous monitoring of respiratory rate and heart rate
Time frame: Within 60 days of index surgery
Time from index surgery to hospital discharge
Time frame: Within 60 days of index surgery
Time spent on continuous and intermittent monitoring
Time frame: Within 60 days of index surgery
Time spent in predefined abnormal RR and HR, with continuous and intermittent monitoring
Karolinska Institutet
Other
Comparison Between Continuous and Intermittent Monitoring of Abnormal Respiratory and Heart Rate in Relation to Length of Stay. A Clinical Multicenter Study of Continuous Wireless Monitoring Within the NIGHTINGALE Project
Acronym: CIM-LOS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05869578
Anesthesia Complication, Anesthesia Morbidity
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
View Trial DetailsNCT04194060
Digestive System Diseases, Disease Attributes
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
View Trial DetailsNCT04719884
Pathologic Processes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Ljubljana, Slovenia
View Trial DetailsNCT05738603
Cardiovascular Diseases, Head and Neck Cancer
Poznan, Poznań, Poland
View Trial Details