Faculty of dentistry Cairo university
Cairo, Manyal, 11555, Egypt
Active, Not Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06596707
Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars
To achieve an optimal contact area is essential to avoid tooth migration, food impaction, and the occurrence of secondary caries. However, proximal restorations constitute challenge for the professional and tight contact points are difficult to obtain depending not only on tools used, but also on type of restorative material. Current tooth-colored restorative materials are not condensable and there is shrinkage with setting. The aim of this study is to compare the proximal contact tightness of zirconia reinforced glass ionomer versus conventional nanohybrid resin composite when used in class II cavities.
Active, Not Recruiting
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify MeKey information
Age range
19 year–35 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Eligibility Criteria of participants:
Inclusion criteria
of participants:
- Patients with occlusoproximal caries in molars classified as ICDAS III or IV.
- 19-35 years.
- Males or Females.
- Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.
Exclusion criteria
of participants:
- Pregnancy.
- Disabilities.
- Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
- Allergic history concerning methacrylate.
- Rampant caries.
- Heavy smoking.
- Xerostomia.
- Lack of compliance.
- Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching, or temporomandibular joint disorders.
b- Eligibility Criteria of teeth:
Inclusion criteria
of teeth:
- Occlusoproximal caries in molars classified as ICDAS III or IV.
- Vital upper or lower posterior teeth with no signs of irreversible pulpitis.
- Intact contact with opposing teeth.
- Teeth with no previous restorations in other surfaces.
Exclusion criteria
of the teeth:
- Extensive carious lesions
- Periapical pathology or signs of pulpal pathology.
- Tooth hypersensitivity.
- Possible prosthodontic restoration of teeth.
- Heavy occlusion and occlusal contacts or history of bruxism.
- Sever periodontal affection.
Treatment and study plan
Zirconomer
Procedurezirconia modified glass ionomer
Nanohybrid composite
Procedureconventional composite
Primary outcomes
-
Contact Tightness
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year
Measuring the adequacy of proximal contact restoration using intervention ' zirconomer" versus control which is Nanohybrid resin composite.
Heaviness of this contact using Modified USPHS criteria. USPHS criteria are standardized in which a dental floss is used.
Contact tightness can have one of three scores:
Alpha Bravo Charlie
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Comparison of Proximal Contact Tightness of Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Versus Conventional Nanohybrid Resin Composite: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Important dates
- Study start
- 2023
- Primary completion
- 2024
- Study completion
- 2024
- First posted
- Sep 19, 2024
- Registry last updated
- Sep 19, 2024
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.