City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
NCT Number: NCT03776253
This trial will pilot a psychosocial intervention called Conquer Fear Support (CFS) in patients with stage III-IV lung or gynecologic cancer who are experiencing fear of cancer progression. The intervention is adapted from a novel program called "Conquer Fear" which was developed by researchers in Australia. CFS may help in reducing worries, fears, and uncertainty in patients with advanced lung or gynecological cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Assess the feasibility and acceptability of the CFS intervention in patients with advanced lung and gynecologic (GYN) cancer (stages III or IV) who have clinically significant levels of fear of cancer progression (FOP) or cancer-related distress.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Assess preliminary effects of the intervention on FOP, cancer-specific distress, anxiety, depression, overall symptom distress, metacognitions, and mindfulness.
OUTLINE:
Patients attend CFS psychosocial intervention consisting of 7 nurse-led sessions (session 1 in-person and sessions 2-7 via video conferencing) over 45 minutes each for 8 weeks. Patients also complete home practice assignments comprising attention training technique and mindfulness practice sessions after each session.
After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at week 12.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Attend CFS
Other names: Conquer Fear Support
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Up to 9 months
Enrollment rate will be deemed sufficient if at least 33 eligible patients are accrued within 9 months.
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Feasibility of the Conquer Fear SUPPORT (CFS) intervention will be assessed by tracking attrition. Attrition is defined as the percentage of participants who withdraw from the study among enrolled participants who completed the baseline questionnaire (i.e., evaluable participants). Feasibility will be evaluated based on whether attrition remains within the prespecified study thresholds at Week 8 (T2) and Week 12 (T3).
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Attendance was assessed as the number of intervention sessions attended by each participant. Seven intervention sessions were offered during the study period.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Home practice was assessed by participant self-report during the intervention period. The outcome reflects the percentage of participants who reported engaging in assigned home practice activities.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Completion of assigned home practice was assessed by participant self-report during the intervention period. The outcome reflects the percentage of participants who reported completing all assigned home practice activities.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Attention training practice was assessed by participant self-report during the intervention period. The outcome reflects the percentage of participants who reported engaging in attention training practice for at least one week.
Time frame: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12)
Fear of progression was assessed using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FOP-Q-SF). The total score ranges from 12 (minimum) to 60 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (i.e., greater fear of progression). Assessments were conducted at three time points: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12).
Time frame: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12)
Cancer-specific distress was assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 88 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (i.e., greater cancer-specific distress). Assessments were conducted at three time points: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12).
Time frame: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12)
Anxiety was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety Short Form 8a (PROMIS-Anxiety 8a). Raw scores range from 8 (minimum) to 40 (maximum) and were converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). In both scoring metrics, higher scores indicate worse outcomes (i.e., greater anxiety). Assessments were conducted at three time points: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12).
Time frame: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12)
Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 27 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (i.e., more severe depressive symptoms). Assessments were conducted at three time points: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12).
Time frame: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12)
Overall symptom distress was assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). The total MSAS score (TMSAS) ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (i.e., greater symptom severity and distress). Assessments were conducted at three time points: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12).
Time frame: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12)
Metacognitions were assessed using the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30). The total score ranges from 30 (minimum) to 120 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (i.e., more dysfunctional metacognitions). Assessments were conducted at three time points: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12).
Time frame: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12)
Mindfulness was assessed using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-15 (FFMQ-15), excluding the Observing subscale per scoring instructions. The total score ranges from 12 (minimum) to 60 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes (i.e., greater mindfulness). Assessments were conducted at three time points: T1 (Baseline), T2 (Week 8), and T3 (Week 12).
City of Hope Medical Center
Other
Conquer Fear SUPPORT: A Psychosocial Intervention in Patients With Advanced Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04819997
Advanced Lung Carcinoma, Lung Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04229381
Advanced Lung Carcinoma, Extensive Stage Lung Small Cell Carcinoma
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05640765
Advanced Lung Carcinoma, Lung Diseases
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05342571
Advanced Lung Carcinoma, Lung Diseases
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details