Child Development and Social Policy Lab
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20057, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06179576
The proposed project is a randomized control trial to assess a novel 6-session parenting and coparenting intervention for low-income parents of infants. Connect to Baby (CTB) will be implemented within one of the largest federally-funded early care and education programs, Early Head Start (EHS), in Washington, DC. To engage both fathers and mothers, CTB recruits parents at the time of birth, capitalizing on the "magic moment" of delivery, and uses father-inclusive digital media content to engage men. A key innovation lies in the introduction and rehearsal of four interaction skills -- Noticing, Following, Talking, and Encouraging (NiFTE, pronounced "Nifty") -- to foster serve-and-return interactions with infants as well as supportive, cooperative coparenting interactions between mothers and fathers. To maximize program uptake, CTB is situated within an early education program parents already trust and attend. Additionally, the study will test hybrid program delivery with both in-person and remote sessions using video-enabled tablets to reduce scheduling and logistical barriers and thereby enhance retention. The specific aims of the project are to assess efficacy of random assignment to Hybrid delivery of CTB relative to EHS as usual at enhancing parenting and coparenting quality and parent and child wellbeing. If demonstrated to be efficacious, this program will provide Early Head Start (and other family-serving agencies) a brief cost-effective, manualized preventive intervention that could be used alone or in conjunction with other services to improve parent functioning and co-parenting, further engage fathers in programming and caregiving, and, ultimately, enhance child development.
Interested in participating?
Request Info2 month–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20057, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Overview:
The proposed project is a randomized control trial to assess the effectiveness of a novel 6-session parenting and coparenting intervention for low-income parents of infants designed by the program developers of Just Beginning (JB) and Family Foundations (FF). Connect to Baby (CTB) blends and builds upon these two evidence-based programs and will be implemented within one of the largest federally-funded early care and education programs, Early Head Start (EHS), in Washington, DC. CTB's approach recognizes that although many existing interventions aim to increase parenting quality in low-income contexts, the vast majority yield only modest effects that often fade. These mixed findings stem, in part, from three key weaknesses in existing programs: 1) a focus on mothers, rather than mothers and fathers; 2) a focus on the parent-child relationship to the exclusion of the coparenting relationship; 3) low program recruitment and retention rates. The co-PIs have successfully piloted a program that addresses these weaknesses and can be easily incorporated into programs like EHS to enhance their effects on parenting, and child development. Specifically, to engage both fathers and mothers, CTB recruits parents at the time of birth, capitalizing on the "magic moment" of delivery, and uses father-inclusive digital media content to engage men. A key innovation lies in the introduction and rehearsal of four interaction skills -- Noticing, Following, Talking, and Encouraging (NiFTE, pronounced "Nifty") -- to foster serve-and-return interactions with infants as well as supportive, cooperative coparenting interactions between mothers and fathers. To maximize program uptake, CTB is situated within an early education program parents already trust and attend. Additionally, the study will test hybrid program delivery with both in-person and remote sessions using video-enabled tablets to reduce scheduling and logistical barriers and thereby enhance retention. CTB has two key targets of intervention - coparenting communication and parenting quality. By enhancing these targets, CTB aims to improve parent mental health, and child socioemotional and language outcomes. The specific aims of the project are to assess efficacy of random assignment to Hybrid delivery of CTB relative to EHS as usual at enhancing program targets and both parent mental health and infant socioemotional and language outcomes. If demonstrated to be efficacious, this program will provide Early Head Start (and other family-serving agencies) a brief cost-effective, manualized preventive intervention that could be used alone or in conjunction with other services to improve parent functioning and co-parenting, further engage fathers in programming and caregiving, and, ultimately, enhance child development.
Families will be randomly assigned to CTB-EHS Hybrid and EHS-digital only conditions. There will be 100 dyads randomly assigned to each condition. The main objective of the study is to test the feasibility of the CTB-Hybrid intervention for enhancing targets of co-parenting and parenting, and outcomes of parent well-being and child language and socioemotional development. The specific aims are:
Aim 1. To assess the efficacy of CTB-Hybrid at improving program targets. One hundred and fifty families will be recruited and randomized to one of two conditions: 1) EHS-CTB Hybrid or 2) EHS-digital with CTB digital content (content delivered via the customized application). CTB is hypothesized to increase coparenting communication quality and parenting quality relative to EHS digital at 3- and 6-months post-random assignment (RA); comparing results at each time point will distinguish immediate from sustained effects of the program. Analyses will include both intent-to-treat (ITT) and treatment-on-the-treated (TOT) analyses to determine the importance of program dosage for program efficacy.
Aim 2. To assess the efficacy of CTB-Hybrid at enhancing secondary program outcomes. CTB will also be assessed with regard to parent mental health (assessed using parent self-report and a short diagnostic interview at 3- and 6-months post (RA), and child socioemotional and language outcomes at 3- and 6-months post RA (assessed using parent-report and objective ratings). In exploratory analyses, parenting and coparenting quality will be tested as mediators and child sex as moderator of effects on secondary outcomes.
Study Site:
13 EHS centers in the Washington DC region.
Recruitment, Screening, Enrollment and Informed Consent:
Participants will be recruited at the EHS centers. Informed consent will be collected remotely via zoom and using REDCAP. Given our experiences during the COVID pandemic we will also collect pre and post measures remotely via zoom. For assessment, EHS-digital only and CTB-hybrid families will pick up a packet from the EHS center that includes a data enabled tablet with a zoom link and links to REDCAP survey links and surveys completed on the tablet and a standard set of toys for the assessment. The materials will be returned to the center after the assessment is complete. Except for the child language measure, MCDI, all measures will be administered at each of the three assessment time points. Mindful of the potential burden of lengthy assessments for this high-risk population, assessments will be administered via two Zoom calls that can be done via mobile phone or tablet separated by one week if needed or requested. Non-proprietary measures will be entered into REDCAP and administered on a tablet or mobile phone.
Study Procedures and Evaluations:
Overall study duration and duration of participant involvement. The intervention is 10 weeks long. Participants will also be involved in a pre-assessment, a post-assessment (3 months post random assignment) and a follow-up (6 months post random assignment)
Retention of Study Subjects:
The hybrid delivery is linked to a trusted service (EHS) and the hybrid delivery allows for flexibility in scheduling.
Fidelity Monitoring:
Each CTB facilitator will participate in a two-day training to learn to use the manual and understand the program's principles and how to effectively use the technology to deliver the content remotely run by the lead CTB facilitator. Once facilitators complete training, the first six sessions each facilitator delivers will be video-recorded, via zoom, for fidelity review. During implementation, every 10th session will be recorded and reviewed for fidelity. The trainer, an LCSW will provide individual and group feedback on the extent to which the facilitator followed the manual and engaged parents effectively. Feedback will be based on video review and a fidelity coding scheme created for CTB in which facilitators are scored for session component completion, and 7 positive engagement, 7 negative engagement criteria, every 30 seconds. Pilot data showed that reliability on the fidelity scheme was high (kappa > .7) as was session fidelity and facilitator quality, with low levels of negative engagement and high levels of positive engagement. Any facilitator not delivering CTB with fidelity will receive a refresher training. Moreover, a clinical supervisor and trainer will be available via phone.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
To engage both fathers and mothers, CTB recruits parents at the time of birth, capitalizing on the "magic moment" of delivery, and uses father-inclusive digital media content to engage men. A key innovation lies in the introduction and rehearsal of four interaction skills -- Noticing, Following, Talking, and Encouraging (NiFTE, pronounced "Nifty") -- to foster serve-and-return interactions with infants as well as supportive, cooperative coparenting interactions between mothers and fathers. To maximize program uptake, CTB is situated within an early education program parents already trust and attend. Additionally, the study will test hybrid program delivery with both in-person and remote sessions using video-enabled tablets to reduce scheduling and logistical barriers and thereby enhance retention.
Time frame: At baseline (when families are enrolled in the study)
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Positive parenting behaviors as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: At baselined (when families enroll in the study)
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: at baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 3 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: 6 months
Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Coparenting relationship scale measuring quality of communication, 14 items, scale 1-6.
Time frame: 3 months
Coparenting relationship scale measuring quality of communication, 14 items, scale 1-6.
Time frame: 6 months
Coparenting relationship scale measuring quality of communication, 14 items, scale 1-6.
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Father Engagement Scale, measuring fathers' engagement in 11 activities with infants, scale 0 - 4
Time frame: 3 months
Father Engagement Scale, measuring fathers' engagement in 11 activities with infants, scale 0 - 4
Time frame: 6 months
Father Engagement Scale, measuring fathers' engagement in 11 activities with infants, scale 0 - 4
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised, scale to measure parent depression symptoms (10-items), scale 0 - 3
Time frame: 3 months
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised, scale to measure parent depression symptoms (10-items), scale 0 - 3
Time frame: 6 months
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised, scale to measure parent depression symptoms (10-items), scale 0 - 3
Time frame: at baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Parental Sense of Competence Scale, 17 items, scale 1 - 6
Time frame: 3 months
Parental Sense of Competence Scale, 17 items, scale 1 - 6
Time frame: 6 months
Parental Sense of Competence Scale, 17 items, scale 1 - 6
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Videotaped parent-infant play task coded using the family interactions using the Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDI) Early Communication Indicator (ECI), which codes expressive communication for children between 3 and 36 months.
Time frame: 3 months
Videotaped parent-infant play task coded using the family interactions using the Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDI) Early Communication Indicator (ECI), which codes expressive communication for children between 3 and 36 months.
Time frame: 6 months
Videotaped parent-infant play task coded using the family interactions using the Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDI) Early Communication Indicator (ECI), which codes expressive communication for children between 3 and 36 months.
Time frame: at baseline (when families enroll in the study)
The Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), which assesses behavior problems and competencies, 42 items, scale 0 - 2
Time frame: 3 months
The Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), which assesses behavior problems and competencies, 42 items, scale 0 - 2
Time frame: 6 months
The Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), which assesses behavior problems and competencies, 42 items, scale 0 - 2
Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)
Scale to measure parent anxiety, Generalized Anxiety Scale, 7 items, scale 0 - 3
Time frame: 3 months
Scale to measure parent anxiety, Generalized Anxiety Scale, 7 items, scale 0 - 3
Time frame: 6 months
Scale to measure parent anxiety, Generalized Anxiety Scale, 7 items, scale 0 - 3
Time frame: 3 months
Scale measuring child expressive and receptive language development, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MCDI) for infants/toddlers, 89-word vocabulary checklist, 0 - 178 (each item has 0 - 2 scale)
Time frame: 6 months
Scale measuring child expressive and receptive language development, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MCDI) for infants/toddlers, 89-word vocabulary checklist, 0 - 178 (each item has 0 - 2 scale)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Georgetown University
Other
Connect to Baby: A Pilot Study of a Parenting and Coparenting Program for New Parents
Acronym: CTB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07667738
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Lima, Peru
View Trial DetailsNCT06397794
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07071766
Parenting, Perinatal Substance Use
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06324318
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details