Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06179576

Connect to Baby: A Pilot Study of a Parenting and Coparenting Program

The proposed project is a randomized control trial to assess a novel 6-session parenting and coparenting intervention for low-income parents of infants. Connect to Baby (CTB) will be implemented within one of the largest federally-funded early care and education programs, Early Head Start (EHS), in Washington, DC. To engage both fathers and mothers, CTB recruits parents at the time of birth, capitalizing on the "magic moment" of delivery, and uses father-inclusive digital media content to engage men. A key innovation lies in the introduction and rehearsal of four interaction skills -- Noticing, Following, Talking, and Encouraging (NiFTE, pronounced "Nifty") -- to foster serve-and-return interactions with infants as well as supportive, cooperative coparenting interactions between mothers and fathers. To maximize program uptake, CTB is situated within an early education program parents already trust and attend. Additionally, the study will test hybrid program delivery with both in-person and remote sessions using video-enabled tablets to reduce scheduling and logistical barriers and thereby enhance retention. The specific aims of the project are to assess efficacy of random assignment to Hybrid delivery of CTB relative to EHS as usual at enhancing parenting and coparenting quality and parent and child wellbeing. If demonstrated to be efficacious, this program will provide Early Head Start (and other family-serving agencies) a brief cost-effective, manualized preventive intervention that could be used alone or in conjunction with other services to improve parent functioning and co-parenting, further engage fathers in programming and caregiving, and, ultimately, enhance child development.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

2 month–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Child Development and Social Policy Lab

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20057, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Rebecca Ryan

CONTACT

[email protected]

917-518-6426

About this study

Overview:

The proposed project is a randomized control trial to assess the effectiveness of a novel 6-session parenting and coparenting intervention for low-income parents of infants designed by the program developers of Just Beginning (JB) and Family Foundations (FF). Connect to Baby (CTB) blends and builds upon these two evidence-based programs and will be implemented within one of the largest federally-funded early care and education programs, Early Head Start (EHS), in Washington, DC. CTB's approach recognizes that although many existing interventions aim to increase parenting quality in low-income contexts, the vast majority yield only modest effects that often fade. These mixed findings stem, in part, from three key weaknesses in existing programs: 1) a focus on mothers, rather than mothers and fathers; 2) a focus on the parent-child relationship to the exclusion of the coparenting relationship; 3) low program recruitment and retention rates. The co-PIs have successfully piloted a program that addresses these weaknesses and can be easily incorporated into programs like EHS to enhance their effects on parenting, and child development. Specifically, to engage both fathers and mothers, CTB recruits parents at the time of birth, capitalizing on the "magic moment" of delivery, and uses father-inclusive digital media content to engage men. A key innovation lies in the introduction and rehearsal of four interaction skills -- Noticing, Following, Talking, and Encouraging (NiFTE, pronounced "Nifty") -- to foster serve-and-return interactions with infants as well as supportive, cooperative coparenting interactions between mothers and fathers. To maximize program uptake, CTB is situated within an early education program parents already trust and attend. Additionally, the study will test hybrid program delivery with both in-person and remote sessions using video-enabled tablets to reduce scheduling and logistical barriers and thereby enhance retention. CTB has two key targets of intervention - coparenting communication and parenting quality. By enhancing these targets, CTB aims to improve parent mental health, and child socioemotional and language outcomes. The specific aims of the project are to assess efficacy of random assignment to Hybrid delivery of CTB relative to EHS as usual at enhancing program targets and both parent mental health and infant socioemotional and language outcomes. If demonstrated to be efficacious, this program will provide Early Head Start (and other family-serving agencies) a brief cost-effective, manualized preventive intervention that could be used alone or in conjunction with other services to improve parent functioning and co-parenting, further engage fathers in programming and caregiving, and, ultimately, enhance child development.

Families will be randomly assigned to CTB-EHS Hybrid and EHS-digital only conditions. There will be 100 dyads randomly assigned to each condition. The main objective of the study is to test the feasibility of the CTB-Hybrid intervention for enhancing targets of co-parenting and parenting, and outcomes of parent well-being and child language and socioemotional development. The specific aims are:

Aim 1. To assess the efficacy of CTB-Hybrid at improving program targets. One hundred and fifty families will be recruited and randomized to one of two conditions: 1) EHS-CTB Hybrid or 2) EHS-digital with CTB digital content (content delivered via the customized application). CTB is hypothesized to increase coparenting communication quality and parenting quality relative to EHS digital at 3- and 6-months post-random assignment (RA); comparing results at each time point will distinguish immediate from sustained effects of the program. Analyses will include both intent-to-treat (ITT) and treatment-on-the-treated (TOT) analyses to determine the importance of program dosage for program efficacy.

Aim 2. To assess the efficacy of CTB-Hybrid at enhancing secondary program outcomes. CTB will also be assessed with regard to parent mental health (assessed using parent self-report and a short diagnostic interview at 3- and 6-months post (RA), and child socioemotional and language outcomes at 3- and 6-months post RA (assessed using parent-report and objective ratings). In exploratory analyses, parenting and coparenting quality will be tested as mediators and child sex as moderator of effects on secondary outcomes.

Study Site:

13 EHS centers in the Washington DC region.

Recruitment, Screening, Enrollment and Informed Consent:

Participants will be recruited at the EHS centers. Informed consent will be collected remotely via zoom and using REDCAP. Given our experiences during the COVID pandemic we will also collect pre and post measures remotely via zoom. For assessment, EHS-digital only and CTB-hybrid families will pick up a packet from the EHS center that includes a data enabled tablet with a zoom link and links to REDCAP survey links and surveys completed on the tablet and a standard set of toys for the assessment. The materials will be returned to the center after the assessment is complete. Except for the child language measure, MCDI, all measures will be administered at each of the three assessment time points. Mindful of the potential burden of lengthy assessments for this high-risk population, assessments will be administered via two Zoom calls that can be done via mobile phone or tablet separated by one week if needed or requested. Non-proprietary measures will be entered into REDCAP and administered on a tablet or mobile phone.

Study Procedures and Evaluations:

Overall study duration and duration of participant involvement. The intervention is 10 weeks long. Participants will also be involved in a pre-assessment, a post-assessment (3 months post random assignment) and a follow-up (6 months post random assignment)

Retention of Study Subjects:

The hybrid delivery is linked to a trusted service (EHS) and the hybrid delivery allows for flexibility in scheduling.

Fidelity Monitoring:

Each CTB facilitator will participate in a two-day training to learn to use the manual and understand the program's principles and how to effectively use the technology to deliver the content remotely run by the lead CTB facilitator. Once facilitators complete training, the first six sessions each facilitator delivers will be video-recorded, via zoom, for fidelity review. During implementation, every 10th session will be recorded and reviewed for fidelity. The trainer, an LCSW will provide individual and group feedback on the extent to which the facilitator followed the manual and engaged parents effectively. Feedback will be based on video review and a fidelity coding scheme created for CTB in which facilitators are scored for session component completion, and 7 positive engagement, 7 negative engagement criteria, every 30 seconds. Pilot data showed that reliability on the fidelity scheme was high (kappa > .7) as was session fidelity and facilitator quality, with low levels of negative engagement and high levels of positive engagement. Any facilitator not delivering CTB with fidelity will receive a refresher training. Moreover, a clinical supervisor and trainer will be available via phone.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be a mother, father (or father figure, including same sex parent and grandparent) of an infant who is 2-24 months.
  • Must speak and read English or Spanish with sufficient fluency for completion of consent forms and questionnaires and actively participate in the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pre-intervention assessment their score on the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) Interpersonal Violence (IPV) screener (Brown, Lent, Schmidt, & Sas, 2000) indicates sexual or physical abuse.

Treatment and study plan

Connect to Baby

Behavioral

To engage both fathers and mothers, CTB recruits parents at the time of birth, capitalizing on the "magic moment" of delivery, and uses father-inclusive digital media content to engage men. A key innovation lies in the introduction and rehearsal of four interaction skills -- Noticing, Following, Talking, and Encouraging (NiFTE, pronounced "Nifty") -- to foster serve-and-return interactions with infants as well as supportive, cooperative coparenting interactions between mothers and fathers. To maximize program uptake, CTB is situated within an early education program parents already trust and attend. Additionally, the study will test hybrid program delivery with both in-person and remote sessions using video-enabled tablets to reduce scheduling and logistical barriers and thereby enhance retention.

Primary outcomes

  1. Parent Acceptance/Warmth during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: At baseline (when families are enrolled in the study)

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  2. Parent Acceptance/Warmth during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  3. Parent Acceptance/Warmth during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 6 months

    Positive parenting behaviors as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  4. Parent Descriptive Language during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: At baselined (when families enroll in the study)

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  5. Parent Descriptive Language during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  6. Parent Descriptive Language during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  7. Parent Follows child's lead during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  8. Parent Follows child's lead during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  9. Parent Follows child's lead during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  10. Parent Extends Child's Focus during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  11. Parent Extends Child's Focus during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  12. Parent Extends Child's Focus during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  13. Parent restricts child during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  14. Parent restricts child during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  15. Parent restricts child during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  16. Parent criticizes child during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  17. Parent criticizes child during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  18. Parent criticizes child during parent-child interactions

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating (0-4 scale) of as coded from a 25 minute parent-child interaction

  19. Coparenting Quality:mother-father pleasure in coparenting

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  20. Coparenting Quality:mother-father pleasure in coparenting

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  21. Coparenting Quality:mother-father pleasure in coparenting

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  22. Coparenting Quality: displeasure in coparenting

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  23. Coparenting Quality: displeasure in coparenting

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  24. Coparenting Quality: displeasure in coparenting

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  25. Coparenting Quality: interactiveness

    Time frame: at baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  26. Coparenting Quality: interactiveness

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  27. Coparenting Quality: interactiveness

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  28. Coparenting Quality: cooperation

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  29. Coparenting Quality: cooperation

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  30. Coparenting Quality: cooperation

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  31. Coparenting Quality: competition

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  32. Coparenting Quality: competition

    Time frame: 3 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  33. Coparenting Quality: competition

    Time frame: 6 months

    Qualitative rating scale (1-5) as coded from a 25 minutes mother-father-child interaction

  34. Coparenting Relationship Scale

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Coparenting relationship scale measuring quality of communication, 14 items, scale 1-6.

  35. Coparenting Relationship Scale

    Time frame: 3 months

    Coparenting relationship scale measuring quality of communication, 14 items, scale 1-6.

  36. Coparenting Relationship Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

    Coparenting relationship scale measuring quality of communication, 14 items, scale 1-6.

  37. Father Engagement Scale

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Father Engagement Scale, measuring fathers' engagement in 11 activities with infants, scale 0 - 4

  38. Father Engagement Scale

    Time frame: 3 months

    Father Engagement Scale, measuring fathers' engagement in 11 activities with infants, scale 0 - 4

  39. Father Engagement Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

    Father Engagement Scale, measuring fathers' engagement in 11 activities with infants, scale 0 - 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parent mental health

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised, scale to measure parent depression symptoms (10-items), scale 0 - 3

  2. Parent mental health

    Time frame: 3 months

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised, scale to measure parent depression symptoms (10-items), scale 0 - 3

  3. Parent mental health

    Time frame: 6 months

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised, scale to measure parent depression symptoms (10-items), scale 0 - 3

  4. Parent self efficacy

    Time frame: at baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Parental Sense of Competence Scale, 17 items, scale 1 - 6

  5. Parent self efficacy

    Time frame: 3 months

    Parental Sense of Competence Scale, 17 items, scale 1 - 6

  6. Parent self efficacy

    Time frame: 6 months

    Parental Sense of Competence Scale, 17 items, scale 1 - 6

  7. Child language development

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Videotaped parent-infant play task coded using the family interactions using the Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDI) Early Communication Indicator (ECI), which codes expressive communication for children between 3 and 36 months.

  8. Child language development

    Time frame: 3 months

    Videotaped parent-infant play task coded using the family interactions using the Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDI) Early Communication Indicator (ECI), which codes expressive communication for children between 3 and 36 months.

  9. Child language development

    Time frame: 6 months

    Videotaped parent-infant play task coded using the family interactions using the Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDI) Early Communication Indicator (ECI), which codes expressive communication for children between 3 and 36 months.

  10. Child socioemotional development

    Time frame: at baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    The Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), which assesses behavior problems and competencies, 42 items, scale 0 - 2

  11. Child socioemotional development

    Time frame: 3 months

    The Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), which assesses behavior problems and competencies, 42 items, scale 0 - 2

  12. Child socioemotional development

    Time frame: 6 months

    The Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), which assesses behavior problems and competencies, 42 items, scale 0 - 2

  13. Parent Generalized Anxiety Scale

    Time frame: At baseline (when families enroll in the study)

    Scale to measure parent anxiety, Generalized Anxiety Scale, 7 items, scale 0 - 3

  14. Parent Generalized Anxiety Scale

    Time frame: 3 months

    Scale to measure parent anxiety, Generalized Anxiety Scale, 7 items, scale 0 - 3

  15. Parent Generalized Anxiety Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

    Scale to measure parent anxiety, Generalized Anxiety Scale, 7 items, scale 0 - 3

  16. Child Language Development

    Time frame: 3 months

    Scale measuring child expressive and receptive language development, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MCDI) for infants/toddlers, 89-word vocabulary checklist, 0 - 178 (each item has 0 - 2 scale)

  17. Child Language Development

    Time frame: 6 months

    Scale measuring child expressive and receptive language development, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MCDI) for infants/toddlers, 89-word vocabulary checklist, 0 - 178 (each item has 0 - 2 scale)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Rachel Barr, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Rebecca Ryan, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

202-687-2215

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Georgetown University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Connect to Baby: A Pilot Study of a Parenting and Coparenting Program for New Parents

Acronym: CTB

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 22, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.