Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06958991

Confocal Histolog Scanner in Routine Breast-Conserving Surgery (CHiB)

The clinical performance study is collecting data from the use of a CE mark product used within the scope of its intended purpose to intraoperatively visualize tissue specimen. The subjects are not submitted to invasive and burdensome procedures compared to the standard of care surgical practices and regular use of the CE mark product.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

HFR

Villars-sûr-glâne, Canton of Fribourg, 1752, Switzerland

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Benedetta Guani BG HFR Fribourg - Hôpital cantonal

CONTACT

[email protected]

0041263062956

About this study

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Moreover, numerous women have the diagnosis of a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) each year, which can develop to invasive breast cancer without therapy. Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is the most performed surgical treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer and/ or DCIS. There is an ongoing need for more immediate and accurate methods for the intraoperative assessment (IOA) of breast tissue margins to achieve tumor free margins. A method for rapidly and accurately identifying positive surgical margins intraoperatively would allow the surgeon to immediately excise additional tissue to achieve negative margins. Thereby sparing the Subject a reoperation with all following consequences i.e., reduced oncological safety, reduced cosmetic, and economic burden. The Histolog® Scanner (HLS), a confocal laser scanning microscope was developed with the CE Mark intended use of imaging excised human tissue specimens to visualize morphological microstructures. Such a feature allows real-time IOA offering cutting edge imaging support beyond the conventional imaging techniques in clinical decision making. Promising results have been previously obtained in the SENOSI study of Sion (Switzerland) and the POLARHIS and HELIXIR studies in Germany. Therefore, this study is proposed to evaluate in real life the reoperation rates (ROR) of breast cancer and/or DCIS surgery when the HLS is used in the context of breast tissue margin assessment.

Primary Objective:

Evaluate the proportion of patients that had a surgical reoperation due to cancer-positive margins (Reoperation Rate).

Secondary Objectives:

Detection Rate

  • To evaluate real life detection of breast cancerwhen the HLS and accessories are used intraoperatively by surgeons for the assessment of breast surgical specimens in comparison with the final pathology assessment (gold standard) Usability
  • To survey usability of the HLS and accessories when used intraoperatively by surgeons for the assessment of breast surgical specimens Economic Impact
  • To evaluate the economic impact for the hospitals/payers of the reoperation rate achieved by the use of the HLS and accessories for the assessment of breast surgical specimens Safety
  • To monitor the safety of HLS and accessories when used intraoperatively by surgeons for the assessment of breast surgical specimens

Primary Endpoint:

Reoperation Rate

  • Proportion of women who had a reoperation because of cancer positive margins identified at final pathology assessment.

Secondary Endpoints:

Detection Rate

  • Proportion of women for whom an unsafe margin was detected with HLS
  • Agreement between margin cancerous status of the main surgical specimen and of recuts determined intraoperatively with the HLS and postoperative final pathology assessment using histological slides
  • Rates of the intraoperative recuts depending on the different evaluation tools (HLS, ultrasound and specimen radiography)
  • Weight and dimensions of surgical specimens
  • HLS usage time on surgical specimens and recuts Usability
  • Usability rates of HLS and accessories including image acquisition, processing, and analysing time
  • Relevant tissue microstructures recognition by surgeons/ user
  • HLS and accessories ease of use
  • Rate of HLS' damage to tissue specimens

Economic Impact

  • Change in hospital cost per patient with BCS with or without using the HLS and accessories. This will be evaluated by monitoring the costs of breast conserving surgeries and the costs related to the use of the HLS including device price, HLS consumables, time of use of the HLS, reoperation rates and their associated surgical resources.

Safety

  • Incidence of adverse device effects during the surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult female Subject ≥18 years old.
  • Subject scheduled for breast conserving surgery of invasive and/or in-situ ductal and lobular carcinoma.
  • Subject is able to read, understand and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject with planned mastectomy
  • Subject does not speak French- Subject with planned tumor-adapted breast reduction
  • Subject is pregnant/ lactating. Subjects pregnant/lactating are excluded because such subjects are presenting additional risks during the surgery and they are also rare.
  • Participation in any other clinical study that would affect data acquisition.

Treatment and study plan

Histolog Scanner

Device

The clinical performance study is collecting data from the use of a CE mark product used within the scope of its intended purpose to intraoperatively visualize tissue specimen. The subjects are not submitted to invasive and burdensome procedures compared to the standard of care surgical practices and regular use of the CE mark product.

Primary outcomes

  1. Reoperation Rate

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment (surgery) at 1 month

    Proportion of women who had a reoperation because of cancer positive margins identified at final pathology assessment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Detection Rate

    Time frame: 1 year

    • Agreement between margin cancerous status of the main surgical specimen and of recuts determined intraoperatively with the HLS and postoperative final pathology assessment using histological slides (sensibility and specificity)
  2. Usability

    Time frame: 1 year

    • Usability rates of HLS and accessories: analysis time
  3. Economic Impact

    Time frame: 1 year

    • Change in hospital cost per patient with BCS with or without using the HLS and accessories. This will be evaluated by comparing the usual average cost of breast conserving surgeries and the costs related to the use of the HLS during the surgery
  4. Incidence of adverse device effects

    Time frame: 14 month

    Incidence of adverse device effects during the surgery.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Fribourg

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Confocal Histolog Scanner in Routine Breast-Conserving Surgery

Acronym: CHiB

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
May 6, 2025
Registry last updated
Nov 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.