Davita
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
NCT Number: NCT05493423
This study is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm study with subjects acting as their own control designed to confirm the safety, performance, and usability of the V Needle, a new safety needle for use during in-clinic hemodialysis that is designed to automatically generate a partial occlusion of the internal fluid path and trigger the hemodialysis machine to alarm and shut off if a complete dislodgement of the venous needle from the arm inadvertently occurs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
In patients undergoing hemodialysis for the treatment of end-stage renal disease, Venous Needle Dislodgement (VND) is a rare, but potentially fatal situation in which the needle delivering a patient's blood back to the body after filtration by a dialysis machine becomes inadvertently disconnected from the patient. Hemotek Medical Inc. has developed the V Needle, a venous needle return that is designed to reduce patient risk from exsanguination-related injury or death. This clinical study will serve as a confirmatory study to gain FDA marketing clearance of the Hemotek V Needle system in the clinical setting. During this study, the ability of the V Needle to successfully deliver appropriate hemodialysis therapy per the facility's guidelines will be assessed. It will also be used to determine if the V Needle triggers false blood alarms under normal operating conditions. This study will also be used to demonstrate the V Needle meets effective usability criteria. Rates of adverse events and ability to complete the hemodialysis session will be compared to the rates recorded using commercially available devices during the hemodialysis sessions prior to the use of the Hemotek V Needle.
The study is an open-label, non-randomized, single arm, multi-center trial with subject's serving as their own control. For the first three (3) control sessions, subjects will undergo usual hemodialysis sessions with a commercially available device. For the remaining six (6) sessions, subjects will be cannulated with a V Needle in place of a usual venous line AV fistula set.
The hemodialysis sessions will be conducted in the clinic. Subjects will be observed by a clinician for the duration of each session. Clinicians will monitor the session for any abnormal disruptions, therapy interruptions, and/or adverse events, including hemolysis, due to V Needle presence. All machine blood alarms, therapy interruptions, and/or partial or complete needle dislodgements will be recorded and immediately corrected. A clinician will perform cannulation.
Cannulation site and surrounding tissue will be examined by the nurse and assessed for any locally induced trauma before and after treatment. A survey will be completed by the clinicians and patients to assess usability, comfort, and feelings of safety of the V Needle.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Hemotek Medical Inc. has developed the V Needle, a new AV fistula set for hemodialysis designed to reduce patient risk from exsanguination-related injury or death during therapy. In the event of complete dislodgement of the V Needle from the arm during use, the V Needle is designed to activate, creating high line pressure designed to generate an automated dialysis machine blood pump shut down.
Other names: V Needle
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
A successful hemodialysis session is one in which the physician's dialysis prescription has been appropriately delivered. There are only two options for results: successful or unsuccessful. Success rates will be calculated for 3 control sessions using standard of care needles and compared with the average success rate determined from 6 experimental V Needle sessions.
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
The hemodialysis machine alarm rate will be monitored per session and then averaged and compared for three control sessions using standard of care needles and then again for six experimental V Needle sessions.
Time frame: 3 weeks (time required to complete all control and test dialysis sessions per patient)
Overall false alarm rate per hemodialysis session as determined as a percentage of all venous alarms.
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Rate of venous alarms per hemodialysis session
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
% All (false) Alarms Related to V Needle footplate opening inappropriately during each hemodialysis session
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
% of all alarms related to Venous needle per hemodialysis session
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Percentage of the hemodialyis sessions during which the clinical staff was required to change the original blood flow rate setting during therapy sessions
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Venous Pressure (in mm Hg) per hemodialysis session for subjects dialyzing at a flow rate of 400 mL/min
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Venous Pressure (in mm Hg_) per hemodialysis session for subjects dialyzing at a flow rate of 450 mL/min
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Transmembrane Pressure (mm Hg) per hemodialysis session for subjects dialyzing at 400 mL/min
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Transmembrane Pressure (mm Hg) per hemodialysis session for subjects dialyzing at 450 mL/min
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Arterial Pressure (mm Hg) per each session for subjects dialyzing at a flow rate of 400 mL/min
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Arterial Pressure (mm Hg) per session for those subjects dialyzing at a flow rate of 450 mL/min
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Variations of the blood flow rate will be monitored to determine if the achieved blood flow rate during a given session is within 75% of the prescribed blood flow rate. Assessments will be determined for three control sessions using standard of care needles and for six V Needle sessions.
Time frame: 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
The clinician will self-report if the fistula was successfully cannulated (a yes or no metric) for three control sessions using standard of care needles and for six V Needle test sessions.
Hemotek Medical Inc
Industry
Confirmatory Study to Assess the V Needle in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients During In-Clinic Hemodialysis: Clinic-SAVER
Acronym: Clinic-SAVER
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06515899
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Stevenage, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT03719339
Acute Cellular Graft Rejection, Antibody-mediated Rejection
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04817774
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Leuven, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT02984124
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details