University Hospital Zurich, Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8006, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06350786
This study aims to evaluate whether the reduction of the daily morphine equivalent dose (MED) in patients with subacute and chronic pain can be decreased with an open-label placebo (OLP) intervention in comparison to an electronic monitoring (EM) control group. The participants will receive the intervention (OPL or EM) over the duration of six weeks. Diverse psychological and health measures will be assessed with questionnaires over the course of the intervention. Furthermore, evaluation outcomes, qualitative outcomes and safety outcomes will be assessed. It is hypothesized that the OLP-intervention group in comparison to the EM-control group will have a significantly lower consumption of MED over the course of the study. Furthermore, this study aims to evaluate whether the OLP intervention can reduce opioid withdrawal symptoms in comparison to the control group.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8006, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
Pain is a major global health problem and is often treated with opioid medication, although risks outweigh the benefits (EFIC, 2022; Goldberg & McGee, 2011; Sandhu et al., 2018). The administration of an open-label placebo (OLP) treatment, i.e., the placebo treatment with full disclosure of being a placebo, has proven to be an effective treatment in pain syndromes [i.e., chronic low back pain (Carvalho et al., 2016; Kleine-Borgmann et al., 2019) and irritable bowel syndrome (Kaptchuk et al., 2010)]. Likewise, meta-analyses reveal that patients in an OLP condition exhibit significantly greater improvement in pain relief than those in a control group (Buergler et al., 2023; von Wernsdorff et al., 2021). Moreover, and of relevance when it comes to the need to reduce opioid medication, OLPs have been shown to be a promising candidate for drug tapering: In line with the conditioning paradigm, the drug as the unconditioned stimulus is paired with the neutral stimulus of an OLP in a learning phase. Then, the OLP alone becomes a conditioned stimulus (Benedetti, 2008; Doering & Rief, 2012; Martin-Pichora et al., 2011; Price et al., 1999).
A new line of research that indicates that OLPs are effective as an adjunctive treatment for the reduction of drugs have been shown to be feasible for the reduction of active medication in opioid use disorder (Belcher et al., 2019, 2023), acute pain (Bernstein et al., 2019; Flowers et al., 2021; Morales-Quezada et al., 2020; Sezer et al., 2021), chronic posttraumatic pain (Estudillo-Guerra et al., 2021), and ADHD (Sandler et al., 2010; Sandler & Bodfish, 2008).
Despite these promising findings, there is a lack of trials that examine OLP as adjunctive treatment for the reduction of opioid medication in the subacute and chronic pain population. OLPs are suitable for the controlled reduction of long-acting opioids that are embedded in the planned reduction regimen, and could provide a means of harnessing analgesic placebo effects in patients with subacute and chronic pain, without any loss in pain management efficacy. The major goal of our study is therefore to support participants in their aim to reduce their opioid intake.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In the intervention group, open-label placebos are administered within the framework of a mind-body management intervention approach, which in turn is consistent with the biopsychosocial model of pain and with a patient-centred approach. The verbal interaction follows the four discussion points:
In addition, during the intervention, participants use electronic monitoring (EM) to track medication and OLP intakes.
In the EM control group, the focus lies on the electronic monitoring of the opioid intake. The treatment rationale is designed to facilitate the reduction of opioid medication by promoting a positive attitude towards the implementation of the reduction. The verbal interaction follows the four discussion points:
Time frame: Daily measure: starts on day 1 after the first intervention visit (baseline, day 0) after randomization and ends on day 42 at the end of the study.
Cumulative dose (i.e. total amount) of opioid pain medication consumption based on daily morphine equivalent doses (MED). Data is collected in SEMA3 app.
Time frame: Measured three times: on day 0 at the first intervention visit (baseline), on day 7, and on day 42 at the end of the study.
Subjective opioid withdrawal will be assessed with the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS). The intensity of the withdrawal symptoms is rated by the patient on a scale between 0 (= not at all) and 4 (= extremely), the scores for individual symptoms are added to a total sum score, which can range from 0 to 64. The secondary endpoint will be the subjective opioid withdrawal score at study end (t3).
Time frame: Measured three times: on day 0 at the first intervention visit (baseline), on day 7, and at the end of the study on day 42.
Pain severity is assessed using the ICD-11 specifiers or 'extension codes'. The index combines patient-assessed ratings of pain intensity, pain-related distress and pain-related interference. Each of these ratings is assessed on an 11-point NRS rating scale, and these are mapped into the following categories depending on the NRS score: none = NRS 0, mild = NRS 1 - 3, moderate = NRS 4 - 6 and severe = NRS 7 - 10.
Time frame: Measured three times: on day 0 at the first intervention visit (baseline), on day 7, and at the end of the study on day 42.
Pain disability is assessed using the pain disability index (PDI) to determine the subjective degree of self-reported impairment caused by the pain problem in everyday life. Seven domains of life are assessed: (1) family and domestic responsibilities, (2) recreation, (3) social activities, (4) occupation, (5) sexual life, (6) self-care and (7) essential activities. The scale ranges from 0 "no impairment" (minimum) - 10 "full impairment" (maximum).
Time frame: Measured three times: on day 0 at the first intervention visit (baseline), on day 7, and at the end of the study on day 42.
Anxiety is assessed using the German version of the GAD-7. It is a brief instrument for assessing self-reported generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) symptoms with seven items asking about the main diagnostic criteria of GAD according to the DSM-IV and the ICD-10 criteria. The questions refer to the past two weeks. The scale ranges from "not at all" (minimum); "On some days"; "On more than half of the days"; "almost every day" (maximum).
Time frame: Measured three times: on day 0 at the first intervention visit (baseline), on day 7, and at the end of the study on day 42.
Depression is assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D) consisting of nine items referring to the past two weeks. The German version of the PHQ was derived from the 'Prime MD Patient Health Questionnaire' and is based on the criteria of the DSM-IV. The scale ranges from "not at all" (minimum); "On some days"; "On more than half of the days"; "almost every day" (maximum).
Time frame: Measured three times: on day 0 at the first intervention visit (baseline), on day 7, and at the end of the study on day 42.
The POABS-CA in the German version measures pain opioid beliefs based on two components with 10 items and a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("strongly disagree") to 4 ("strongly agree"). The higher the score, the more negative was the opinion about the use of opioid analgesics for cancer pain, and the stronger was the belief that pain should be endured.
Time frame: One-time assessment: measured on day 0 at the first intervention visit (baseline).
Expectation measures will be measured in analogy to the most relevant outcomes. First, subjectively expected amount (dose) of opioid medication taken will be examined. For this, the following item will be used at the end of the study "How much opioid medication do you think you will be taking at the end of the study?" The item is answered by naming the type of medication, frequency and amount (dose) of medication.
Time frame: One-time assessment: measured on day 0 at the first intervention visit (baseline).
Expectation measures will be measured in analogy to the most relevant outcomes. Second, to measure the expected withdrawal symptoms at the end of the study, items from the SOWS questionnaire will be used, which are expanded with instructions regarding the expectation.
Time frame: Daily measure: starts 1 day after the first intervention visit (baseline, day 0) after randomization and ends on day 42 at the end of the study.
The intake of placebo pills by the OLP-group will be electronically monitored using survey provided by the app SEMA3. For statistical analysis a ratio will be calculated. A value of the ration close to 1 indicated a more accurate data entry of the placebo pill intake.
Time frame: Daily measure: starts 1 day after the first intervention visit (baseline, day 0) after randomization and ends on day 42 at the end of the study.
Opioid adherence trajectories will be measured with the app SEMA3 in both groups. In the EM control group, a print of the actual data report from the app (i.e. graph reflecting the pattern of opioid medication intake) will be the basis for the EM-Feedback.
Time frame: One-time assessment: measured on day 42 at the end of the study.
The rationale credibility of the OLP intervention will be assessed in the OLP group at study end. The following questions will be assessed: "How credible did you find the explanation of why placebo treatment can work?", "During the study, did you believe that these were placebo tablets that did not contain a pharmacologic agent?", "Did you find the explanation of why the placebo intervention may work helpful?", "How helpful did you find the explanation of why placebo treatment can work?". Answers will be rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Extremely.
Time frame: One-time assessment: measured on day 42 at the end of the study.
The understanding of placebo will be assessed in both study groups (OLP and control group) at study end using a questionnaire which assesses responders' attitudes regarding non-specific therapies. The first three items of this questionnaire specifically assess the placebo understanding and will be used for this study. The scales differ for the different items.
Scale question 1: "I have never heard of the term"; "I have heard the term before, but I do not know"; "A placebo is ... (open question)" Scale question 2: "For me the term is rather positive" "For me the term is neutral, neither positive nor negative"; "For me the term is rather negative"; "I do not know" Scale question 3. "Yes, very often"; "Yes, but rarely"; "No"; "I do not know"
Additionally participants are asked, if their understanding of placebos might have changed across the study. Scale: "Yes, to the positive because ... (open question)"; Yes, to the negative because ... (open question)"; "No"; "I do not know"
Time frame: One-time assessment: measured on day 42 at the end of the study.
The Patient Provider Connection is a subscale of the German version of the Healing Encounters and Attitudes List (HEAL) which can be used independently from the six subscales. The seven items are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "very strong" assessing participants' attitudes towards patient-provider connection as a non-specific treatment effect. The scale ranges from 0 "not at all" (minimum) to "very much" 4 (maximum)
Time frame: Measured two times: on day 0 at the first intervention visit (baseline) and on day 42 at the end of the study.
Participants' non-opioid medication intake will be assessed by asking the participants about the medication's name, dosage, and reason for intake. Participants will also be asked about the date of prescription.
Time frame: One-time assessment, measured before study start: on day -14, prior to the first intervention visit (baseline, day 0).
Before the start of the study the primary treating physicians will be asked about their acceptability of the OLP approach from patient and physicians point of view. All items will be rated on a five- or seven-point Likert scale.
Time frame: One-time assessment, measured before study start: on day -14, prior to the first intervention visit (baseline, day 0).
The primary treating physicians will be given the same questionnaire on treatment expectations as the participants. They will be asked about their subjective expectation of their patients' use of opioid medication and their subjective expectation of their patients' withdrawal symptoms at the end of the study. In addition, the primary treating physicians will be asked to assess their patients' motivation to reduce opioid pain medication. Motivation will be assessed with the following questions on a satisfaction ruler ranging from 0 % to 100 %: 1. "How satisfied is your patient currently with his opioid medication?", 2. "How confident are you that your patient can change her/his use of opioid medication?".
Time frame: One-time assessment: measured at the end of the study on day 42.
The qualitive outcomes will be assessed with an audio recorded semi-structured interviews and will consist of general questions about placebos and core question about the experience of the OLP intervention, acceptability of the OLP approach and prerequisites, ideas and concerns regarding practical OLP implementation.
Time frame: Measured two times: on day 7 after the first intervention visit (baseline) and on day 42.
Participants answer three questions regarding additional symptoms that might have occurred since the last visit at the study site.
The questions are the following:
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Cosima Locher, PhD
CONTACT
Kiara Bodonyi, MSc
CONTACT
Cosima Locher
Other
Acronym: ROM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06518720
Chronic Pain, Depressive Disorder
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06183281
Chronic Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05561595
Body Weight, Cancer
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07711795
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
View Trial Details