ARTAS™ System
DeviceHair harvest using a computer-assisted system
NCT Number: NCT00926211
The objective of this clinical study is to investigate and compare the safety and efficacy of the Restoration Robotics Computer-Assisted Harvesting System to the manual hair follicle harvesting method following a nine-month period of post-procedural evaluation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–59 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Berman Skin Institute, Palo Alto, California, United States
A major technical step in hair transplantation is harvesting of the hair follicles. There are two accepted techniques for obtaining the hair grafts that are transplanted during the procedure. The first is donor strip harvest and stereomicroscopic dissection of the follicular unit grafts. The second is dissection and extraction of the follicular unit graft directly from the patient's scalp referred to as Follicular Unit Extraction or "FUE". Potential benefits of the FUE technique may be less scalp scarring in the Donor Area, less patient discomfort and faster wound healing. Although the FUE approach to harvest has highly desirable attributes, it is technically difficult to perform, labor intensive, tedious and requires an excessive amount of time to harvest follicular units. These procedural factors have prevented the FUE approach from gaining wider adoption.
Restoration Robotics, Inc. has developed the Restoration Robotics ARTAS™ Computer-Assisted Harvesting System to assist physicians in the harvest of hair follicles during hair transplantation procedures. The System mimics the manual FUE approach to harvesting follicular units and has the potential to solve the technical challenges inherent in the manual FUE technique. The ARTAS™ System is capable of identifying and harvesting hair follicles directly from the patient's scalp through a semi-automated process. The goal of the ARTAS™ System is to harvest the hair follicles while maintaining their critical anatomic structures intact.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Hair harvest using a computer-assisted system
Hair harvesting via the manual technique
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 9 Months
The increase in the number of hair follicles present at follow-up in each region compared to the number present at baseline.
Time frame: Time of harvest (Baseline)
The proportion of harvested hair follicles that were transected by each harvest method.
Restoration Robotics, Inc.
Industry
Safety and Efficacy of Computer-Assisted vs. Manual Hair Follicle Harvest: A Comparative Hair Count Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07615608
Alopecia, Androgenetic Alopecia
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06924632
Alopecia, Androgenetic Alopecia
Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07433933
Alopecia, Androgenetic Alopecia
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06927960
Alopecia, Androgenetic Alopecia
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details