CU Sports Medicine
Boulder, Colorado, 80304, United States
NCT Number: NCT00703729
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare clinical post-operative outcomes for patients using active cooling and compression device and those using ice bags and elastic wrap after acromioplasty or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boulder, Colorado, 80304, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The device is applied to the shoulder within 60 minutes of arrival to the recovery room following surgery. The device will be applied at one hour intervals (60 minutes on the shoulder, 60 minutes off) during waking hours for the first 72 hours after surgery. For the remainder of the study period, therapy will be applied for one hour treatments 2-3 times a day during waking hours.
The ice bag is applied to the shoulder within 60 minutes of arrival to the recovery room following surgery. The ice bag is placed on the shoulder and the elastic wrap is used to hold the bag in place. The ice will be applied at one hour intervals (60 minutes on the shoulder, 60 minutes off) during waking hours for the first 72 hours after surgery. For the remainder of the study period, therapy will be applied for one hour treatments 2-3 times a day during waking hours.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 10 cm in length, with "no pain" at the left side of the scale and "extreme pain" at the right side. Scores were measured to the closest millimeter for a 0-100 scale.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 10 cm in length, with "no pain" at the left side of the scale and "extreme pain" at the right side. Scores were measured to the closest millimeter for a 0-100 scale.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 10 cm in length, with "no pain" at the left side of the scale and "extreme pain" at the right side. Scores were measured to the closest millimeter for a 0-100 scale.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 10 cm in length, with "no pain" at the left side of the scale and "extreme pain" at the right side. Scores were measured to the closest millimeter for a 0-100 scale.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 10 cm in length, with "no pain" at the left side of the scale and "extreme pain" at the right side. Scores were measured to the closest millimeter for a 0-100 scale.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 10 cm in length, with "no pain" at the left side of the scale and "extreme pain" at the right side. Scores were measured to the closest millimeter for a 0-100 scale.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 10 cm in length, with "no pain" at the left side of the scale and "extreme pain" at the right side. Scores were measured to the closest millimeter for a 0-100 scale.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 10 cm in length, with "no pain" at the left side of the scale and "extreme pain" at the right side. Scores were measured to the closest millimeter for a 0-100 scale.
Time frame: 1 day
Pain medication was quantified using a morphine equivalent dosage (MED) with the following scale: 1 mg of oral morphine = 1 morphine equivalent. 3 mg morphine = 3 mg hydrocodone = 2 mg oxycodone
Time frame: 1 day
Pain medication was quantified using a morphine equivalent dosage (MED) with the following scale: 1 mg of oral morphine = 1 morphine equivalent. 3 mg morphine = 3 mg hydrocodone = 2 mg oxycodone
Time frame: 1 day
Pain medication was quantified using a morphine equivalent dosage (MED) with the following scale: 1 mg of oral morphine = 1 morphine equivalent. 3 mg morphine = 3 mg hydrocodone = 2 mg oxycodone
Time frame: 1 day
Pain medication was quantified using a morphine equivalent dosage (MED) with the following scale: 1 mg of oral morphine = 1 morphine equivalent. 3 mg morphine = 3 mg hydrocodone = 2 mg oxycodone
Time frame: 1 day
Pain medication was quantified using a morphine equivalent dosage (MED) with the following scale: 1 mg of oral morphine = 1 morphine equivalent. 3 mg morphine = 3 mg hydrocodone = 2 mg oxycodone
Time frame: 1 day
Pain medication was quantified using a morphine equivalent dosage (MED) with the following scale: 1 mg of oral morphine = 1 morphine equivalent. 3 mg morphine = 3 mg hydrocodone = 2 mg oxycodone
Time frame: 1 day
Pain medication was quantified using a morphine equivalent dosage (MED) with the following scale: 1 mg of oral morphine = 1 morphine equivalent. 3 mg morphine = 3 mg hydrocodone = 2 mg oxycodone
University of Colorado, Denver
Other
The Effectiveness of Simultaneous Intermittent Compression and Continuous Cold Therapy on the Post-Operative Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05442814
Anterior Suprascapular Nerve Block, Arthralgia
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05680142
Anesthesia, Local, Arthralgia
Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03638960
Arthralgia, Joint Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07445126
Arthralgia, Artroscopic Surgery
View Trial Details