Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
Ulsan, Ulju, 44919, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT05683158
This is cross-sectional study. By comparing kinematic analysis between stroke and healthy subjects in various directions, this investigation analyzes the compensatory kinematic movement for reaching task in stroke survivors
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–85 year
All sexes
Observational
Ulsan, Ulju, 44919, South Korea
After Institutional Review Board approval, It recruits 2 groups. one group is elderly and another group is stroke survivors. the stroke group that meets the criteria. Another group is age matching of the stroke and not having an orthopedic or neurological disease. Participants of all the groups are assessed for kinematic by motion capture During reaching arm(affected side; stroke group, non-dominant side; healthy group) in 3 directions(medial_45, forward_90 and lateral_135 degrees). Retroreflective markers are placed on 11 anatomical place (3th metacarpal joint, both acromion, elbow lateral and medial epicondyle, lateral and medial styloid process, xyphoid process, sternum, C7, T4). Participants reach to a bell as quickly as possible in three directions. The subject reach to a bell 5 times in each direction and assess clinical evaluation such as Fugl Meyer Assessment, Postural Assessment Scale, Modified Ashworth Scale, shoulder-elbow range of motion and Trunk Instability scale.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria used in the randomized controlled trials were as follows:
Stroke
Healthy
Exclusion criteria
Stroke
Time frame: 1 time (Baseline)
Trunk dislocation (reaching phase in millimetre; mm) in reaching task. The measurements are detected in 3 directions (Forward_90, Lateral_135, Medial_45 degree). Participants reach to a bell as quickly as possible. 3rd joint is calculated for quantitative measurements.
Time frame: 1 time (Baseline)
Elbow extension and shoulder flexion angle (degree) in reaching task. The measurements are detected in 3 directions (Forward_90, Lateral_135, Medial_45 degree). Participants reach to a bell as quickly as possible. 3rd joint is calculated for quantitative measurements.
Time frame: 1 time (Baseline)
Movement units are quantified by counting velocity peaks during the reaching task. A movement unit is defined as a velocity profile segment between a local minimum and the following maximum velocity that exceeds 20 mm/s, with a minimum time interval of 150 ms between subsequent peaks. This measure represents the smoothness of movement, where fewer movement units indicate smoother motion The measurements are detected in 3 directions (Forward_90, Lateral_135, Medial_45 degree). Participants reach to a bell as quickly as possible. 3rd joint is calculated for quantitative measurements.
Time frame: 1 time (Baseline)
The period from hand tangential velocity movement onset to offset was the total time (entire time of reach and return phase [second]). The period when the tangential velocity exceeded 10% of its peak was termed hand movement onset, whereas that when the tangential velocity stayed below 10% of its peak was termed hand movement offset.
The measurements are detected in 3 directions (Forward_90, Lateral_135, Medial_45 degree). Participants reach to a bell as quickly as possible. 3rd joint is calculated for quantitative measurements.
Time frame: 1 time (Baseline)
Tangential velocity was computed for the hand marker's velocity. Peak elbow angular velocity (rad/s) during elbow extension were measured The measurements are detected in 3 directions (Forward_90, Lateral_135, Medial_45 degree). Participants reach to a bell as quickly as possible. 3rd joint is calculated for quantitative measurements.
Time frame: 1 time (Baseline)
Acceleration (rad/s2) during elbow extension was measured The measurements are detected in 3 directions (Forward_90, Lateral_135, Medial_45 degree). Participants reach to a bell as quickly as possible. 3rd joint is calculated for quantitative measurements.
Time frame: 1 time (Baseline)
Tangential velocity was computed for the hand marker's velocity. The period when the tangential velocity exceeded 10% of its peak was termed hand movement onset, whereas that when the tangential velocity stayed below 10% of its peak was termed hand movement offset. Peak hand velocity (mm/s) was analyzed.
The measurements are detected in 3 directions (Forward_90, Lateral_135, Medial_45 degree). Participants reach to a bell as quickly as possible. 3rd joint is calculated for quantitative measurements.
Time frame: Baseline
Related Fugl-Meyer Assessment score(dependent) to predictors(independent) in three directions.
In sitting position, the sum of each subtotal score is 66 (maximum) and the minimum is 0. Subscales were summed to compute a total score. Cutoff scores defined 0~20: severe, 21 ~ 50: moderate, 51~66: mild
Time frame: Baseline
Scoring for Biceps
Time frame: Baseline
Shoulder and elbow joint range of motion
Time frame: 1 time(Baseline)
The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) for stroke has a total score of 23 points, with higher scores indicating better trunk control ability. TIS components:
Static sitting balance - 7 points Dynamic sitting balance - 10 points Coordination - 6 points 23 points = Optimal trunk control ability (normal performance of all items) 0 points = Minimal trunk control ability (unable to perform) Static sitting balance Dynamic sitting balance Co-ordination
Time frame: Baseline
The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS) evaluates postural control in stroke patients, with scores ranging from 0-36 points, where higher scores indicate better functional recovery.
Time frame: Baseline
Upper extremity The total score means that severe <20, 20=<moderate<60, 60=<mild. Higher scores on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment indicate better upper limb motor control with reduced synergistic patterns, while lower scores indicate stronger synergistic patterns due to spasticity
Time frame: Baseline
Scoring for Triceps
University of Valencia
Other
Compensatory Kinematic Movement for Reaching Task in Various Directions in After Stroke
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05767437
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Ulsan, Ulju, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT01000168
Brain Diseases, Brain Injuries
Nesoddtangen, Bjørnemyrveien 11, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT07492849
Atrophy, Brain Diseases
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT01796015
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
View Trial Details