Comparison the Effects of Early Functional Electrical Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerves Stimulation in Functional and Motor Recovery for Acute Stroke Patients

Based on modern knowledge about the neuro-plastic changes that occur immediately after brain injuries, rehabilitation should be more effective when started soon after brain damaged. Besides, knowledge about one of the factors that determine efficacy of rehabilitation is the commencement of treatment, as well as on the time interval from stroke to initiate voluntary movement. Therefore, many studies had reported that the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and transcutaneous electrical nerves stimulation (TENS), which induce stimulation and the excitability, were widely applied in rehabilitation for patients with stroke. However, many investigations about the effects of FES or TENS on motor recovery for the stroke patients mainly focus on the chronic stage as well as compared each of two different kinds of stimulation separately. Hence the investigators will study the impacts of TENS and FES on the motor recovery for the stroke patients from the acute stage. Bedsides, the investigators also study that whether patients after stroke in the acute stage who received adding TENS experienced similar impacts on motor recovery to those who received adding FES.

This was a single-blind randomized control trial study. The study recruited 40 subjects from stroke center of National Taiwan Hospital (NTUH) within 3 days after first stroke onset. All subjects were in stable medically control and assigned randomly to 1 of 3 groups including (1)Functional electrical stimulation (FES) + standard rehabilitation (SR) ,(2) Transcutaneous electrical nerves stimulation (TENS) + SR or (3)SR only (control group).The application of FES and TENS was used for 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week for 2 weeks. The surface electrodes of two dual channels were applied on tibialis anterior and quadriceps for FES and TENS group. All groups received SR including neuro-facilitation and functional task training etc.

Outcome measurements were analyzed with repeated measure analysis of variance using SPSS to compare the main effects before, during, and after treatment, followed by post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction to compare treatment effects among the 3 groups. For categorical variables, a X2 test was used. The significance level was set at 5% (2-tailed).

The inclusion criteria:

• the patient who suffer from first stroke was admitted to the stroke center of National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) within 3 days of onset
• National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores ranging from 5 to 25
• totally activity of daily living independent before stroke onset;
• between 40-80 years old;
• stroke with unilateral hemiparesis lesions confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), with vascular lesions verified by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA);
• a cortical or subcortical infarction or hemorrhage;
• no other peripheral or central nervous system dysfunction;
• no active inflammation or pathologic changes in the joints;
• no active medical problems.

The exclusion criteria:

• medical conditions unrelated to the cerebrovascular accident but which had affected walking performance
• other cognitive, emotional, or behavioral impairments that result in insufficient comprehension, understanding, or collaboration
• medical problems potentially adversely affected by electric stimulation
• had skin conditions, or had allergies etc.