King Vision video laryngoscope
ProcedurePatient intubated with the King Vision Video Laryngoscope
NCT Number: NCT02316769
In this study, the investigators compare the effectiveness of two relatively new video laryngoscopes, McGrath MAC (Covidien, Dublin Ireland) and the King Vision (King Systems, Noblesville, IN), by practitioners experienced in airway management but with limited exposure to these two devices. Our hypothesis was that, the McGrath MAC device would require fewer intubation attempts and shorter intubation times than the King Vision when performed by novice users.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patient intubated with the King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Intubation with the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope
Time frame: participants were followed up to the point the video device is removed from the airway, classified as under 90 seconds.
Time frame: Intubation time was initiated at the time of entry of the study device beyond the teeth/gum line and the intubation time was stopped when the study device was removed beyond the same point.
Number of patients intubated in less than 90 seconds
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Other
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope With the King Vision Video Laryngoscope in Adult Patients.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.