etoposide
DrugDay 1~Day 2: 75mg/m^2
Other names: VP-16
NCT Number: NCT06520163
This study utilizes a prospective, multicenter, randomized two-arm design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the etoposide, cytarabine, and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) combination therapy (EAP regimen) in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A total of 99 NHL patients will be enrolled as research subjects and will be randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to compare the EAP regimen versus disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimen. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving the ideal collection value after a single collection (CD34+ cells ≥5×10^6/kg).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China
Based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 99 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients from 16 hospitals will be selected. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group will receive the EAP regimen, which combines etoposide, cytarabine, and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), while the control group will receive disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimens, such as the CHOP and Hyper-CVAD. Subsequently, the number of CD34+ cells will be monitored. The study will evaluate the proportion of patients achieving the ideal collection value after a single collection (CD34+ cells ≥5×106/kg); the proportion of patients achieving the target collection value cumulatively; the total amount of CD34+ cells collected and the average number of collections; hematological and non-hematological adverse reactions; and the proportion of patients receiving plerixafor.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Day 1~Day 2: 75mg/m^2
Other names: VP-16
Day 1~Day 2: 200g/m^2, q12h
Other names: Ara-C
Day 6: 6mg
Starting from the 9th day, if the white blood cell count is less than 20,000/μL, administer G-CSF at a dose of 5μg/kg by subcutaneous injection until the collection is completed.
[Cyclophosphamide (Cy) + Doxorubicin (ADM) + Vincristine (VDS) + Prednisone (Pred) ]± Rituximab (R)
[Cyclophosphamide + Doxorubicin + Vincristine + Dexamethasone (DXM)] ± Rituximab
[High-Dose Methotrexate (MTX) + Cytarabine] ± Rituximab
[Etoposide + Doxorubicin + Vincristine + Cyclophosphamide + Prednisone] ± Rituximab
[Gemcitabine (G) + Cisplatin (P) + Dexamethasone (DXM)] ± Rituximab
[Gemcitabine + Cisplatin + Dexamethasone + Etoposide] ± Rituximab
[Etoposide + Ifosfamide (IFO) + Carboplatin] ± Rituximab
[Dexamethasone + Ifosfamide + Ifosfamide + Etoposide] ± Rituximab
Time frame: 1 month
Proportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value (CD34+ cells ≥5×10^6/kg) after a single collection.
Time frame: 1 month
To observe and compare the proportion of patients who cumulatively achieve the target collection value (CD34+ cells ≥ 2×10^6/kg) between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen; the proportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value.
Time frame: 1 month
To observe and compare the total cumulative collection of CD34+ cells and the average number of collections between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen.
Time frame: 1 month
To observe and compare the hematological and non-hematological adverse reactions between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen.
Time frame: 1 month
To observe and compare the proportion of patients who receive plerixafor added to the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University
Other Gov
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Etoposide, Cytarabine, and PEG-rhG-CSF Combination Therapy vs. Disease-Specific Chemotherapy for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04002947
DLBCL, Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07620314
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT00131014
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01890486
Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details