Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00602979

Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices

The placement of endotracheal tubes (intubation) is a physiologically stressful procedure for patients. Laryngoscopes are devices-typically composed of a blade attached to a handle with a light source-that allow examination of the upper airway through the mouth, often for the purposes of intubation. Recently some new laryngoscope devices (including the Airtraq® Optical Laryngoscope, the Storz DCI Video laryngoscope®, McGRATH® Video Laryngoscope, and the GlideScope®) have been developed, which may either decrease the stress related to intubation (reduce neck extension, reduce risk of complications or reduce time elapsed during intubation) or improve intubation success (reduce the number of attempts at intubating). Data are being collected in this study to determine which of these commonly-used devices may be better, particularly in comparison to the current hospital standard, the Macintosh laryngoscope. All of the devices to be used in this study are currently cleared or exempt by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Historically, optical and video laryngoscopes have been used as alternative airway management devices for the difficult airway, and as rescue devices. Their use by experienced laryngoscopists has not been compared in a prospective, randomized, head-to-head comparison for routine airway management in adult surgical patients. Video and optical laryngoscopes have been developed to improve the laryngeal view for tracheal intubation and to decrease physiological stress associated with the procedure. The objective of this study is to determine whether these devices offer superior intubating conditions for routine surgical management, over the Macintosh laryngoscope, which is the current standard. The devices to be compared in this study are the most commonly used video and optical laryngoscopes on the market and are cleared or exempt by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Eligible subjects include elective adult surgical patients with an ASA status between 1 and 3 requiring general endotracheal anesthesia. Subjects with a BMI ≥ 40, or undergoing surgery in close proximity to the neck will be excluded. Prior to surgery, subjects will receive a pre-anesthesia evaluation with particular attention to the airway using the Mallampati classification system; atlanto-occipital joint extension; thyro-mental distance; temporomandibular joint function; inter-incisor distance; and dental assessment. Subjects will be randomized for intubation with one of the five laryngoscopes in equal proportions. The following data were recorded: total intubation time, maximum neck extension using an angle gauge, glottic view, assessed by the anesthesiologist using the Cook modification of the Cormack-Lehane grading system (Figure 1), and ease of tracheal intubation using a 5-point rating scale; 5 (excellent) to 1 (poor). Subjects were queried about soreness or painful swallowing in the PACU and a week later via a phone call.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective adult surgical patient requiring general endotracheal anesthesia.
  • Males and Females.
  • ASA Physical Status 1-3.
  • Age 18 years of age and older

Exclusion criteria

  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥35kg/m2.
  • If subject is of childbearing potential, a positive pregnancy test at the time of study enrollment.
  • Has physical, mental, or medical conditions which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could compromise the subject's welfare, ability to communicate with the study staff, complete study activities, or would otherwise contraindicate study participation.
  • Intubated prior to surgery.
  • Severe cardiovascular, hepatic or renal disease.
  • Need for nasal intubation.
  • An investigator of this study.
  • Inclusion in another clinical research study.
  • Subject's refusal or inability to agree to and to sign the Informed Consent Form in English.
  • Subject requiring awake airway management.

Treatment and study plan

Macintosh laryngoscope

Device

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation.

Airtraq® Optical Laryngoscope

Device

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation.

Storz DCI Video Laryngoscope®

Device

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

GlideScope® Video Laryngoscope

Device

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

McGRATH® Video Laryngoscope

Device

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Distribution of Cook's Modification of Cormack-Lehane's Grading System. Each Study Subject Will Receive a Grade of 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, or 4 in the Cormack-Lehane Grading System.

    Time frame: 1 time during laryngoscopy

    Percentage distribution of Cook's modification of Cormack-Lehane's grading system. This is a classification that records the best laryngeal view obtained with or without anterior laryngeal pressure. Each study subject will receive a grade of 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, or 4 in the Cormack-Lehane grading system. Grades 1 and 2A classify as an easy view: when the laryngeal inlet is visible. Grades 2B and 3A classify as restricted: when the posterior glottic structures are visible or the epiglottis is visible and can be lifted. Grades 3B and 4 classify as difficult: when the epiglottis cannot be lifted or when no laryngeal structures are visible.

    Cook's modification of Cormack-Lehane's Grades 1=1, 2=2A,3=2B, 4=3A, 5=3B, 6=4.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Other

Collaborators

  • KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc.
  • King Systems Corporation

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Intubating Conditions With Airtraq Optical, Storz DCI Video, McGRATH Video, GlideScope Video, & Macintosh Laryngoscope in Randomly Selected Elective Adult Surgical Patients

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2011
First posted
Jan 28, 2008
Registry last updated
May 19, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.