Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04943809
There is no difference of the photic phenomena in the two groups.
The study will be a prospective non-randomised controlled study. The target is then to determine the equivalence in the glare. Assumption of Type I error is p=0.05 as level of significance and Type II error is alpha=0.8 as power.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Madrid, 28040, Spain
The study will be a prospective non-randomised controlled study. The target is then to determine the equivalence in the glare. Assumption of Type I error is p=0.05 as level of significance and Type II error is alpha=0.8 as power.
We used the 'TrialSize' package of the R software. Here are the parameters defined for the sample size calculation:
Equivalence limit: 0.10 In order to show no difference between these two groups, 26 patients by groups are needed. With a drop-out of 15%, we obtain 62 patients (31 patients by group) to recruit in order to obtain 52 valuable patients.
This total number of subjects with such requirement is 26 patients in each group.
Group 1 will be made of 26 patients with corneal astigmatism higher than 1.0D in both eyes and lower than 2.5D and will be implanted with the POD 26P AY FT and Group 2 will be made of 26 patients with corneal astigmatism lower than 1.0D in both eyes.
Interim analysis after the 12th patient of each group will have completed the last follow-up will be achieved to confirm the equivalence with the equivalence limit of 0.15.
The POD platform in 26 % (non toric version) is available since 2008 in the monofocal version and since 2012 in the toric one (POD 6P AY T, Ankoris®, PhysIOL).The so-called POD design is characterised by two symmetrical bifid haptics with opened loops that provide four points of support to ensure IOL stability in the capsular bag. The dual C-loop profile shortens the loops, thus improving the pliability of the implant during its injection through a micro-incision. These shortened loops should permit a clockwise or anticlockwise rotary motion and should facilitate the comfortable fitting of the implant orientation after unfolding without elastic-restoring torque. The double C-loop POD design offers 4 support points for the implant within the capsule and ensures its stability. The V-shape of the upper and lower haptics together with the flexibility of the implant allow the loop separation angle to be adjusted and ensure the most accurate adaptation to the capsular bag size. A finite element structural analysis of the implant showed that the elasticity at the distal part of the loop prevents the constraints from being transmitted onto the optical portion of the implant. The trifocal optic is associated to the POD platform and is made of 26 % raw material.
The rotational stability of this non toric version has been clinically investigated on 117 consecutive eyes 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 and 12 months after implantation. The absolute rotation of the lens averaged 2.5 ± 2.6°. The position of the center of the implant relative to the pupillary center expressed by a vector was 0.01 mm at 70°.
The investigational product (POD 26P AY FT) is CE labeled since January 2014. Main IOL features are:
The control product (POD 26P AY F) is CE labeled since 2010. Main IOL features are:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Routine cataract surgery
Routine cataract surgery
Time frame: 3 Months
The primary endpoint is to show statistically equivalent outcomes on glare at the 3 months follow up visit. A significance level of p = 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Time frame: 6 Months
The secondary objective is to measure far, intermediate and near visual acuity of the POD AY 26P FT with respect to the POD AY 26P F.
Time frame: 6 Months
The secondary objective is to measure the refraction of the POD AY 26P FT with respect to the POD AY 26P F.
Time frame: 6 Months
The secondary objective is to measure the centration of the POD AY 26P FT with respect to the POD AY 26P F.
Time frame: 6 Months
The secondary objective is to measure the rotational stability of the POD AY 26P FT with respect to the POD AY 26P F.
Time frame: 6 Months
The secondary objective is to determine the equivalence of the visual acuity of the POD AY 26P FT with respect to the POD AY 26P F.
Time frame: 6 Months
The secondary objective is to determine the contrast sensitivity at far of the POD AY 26P FT with respect to the POD AY 26P F.
Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.
Industry
Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Implantation of the POD 26P AY FT (PhysIOL) and the POD 26P AY F (PhysIOL)
Acronym: PoyPODF/FT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07735000
Age Related Cataract, Cataract
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07605260
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06428955
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06111222
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Heidelberg, Germany
View Trial Details