Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03768102

Comparison of Verbal Rating Scale and Numerical Rating Scale in Post Anesthesia Care Unit

In the postanesthetic care unit(PACU), patients who are recovering from anesthesia are not easy to communicate with. Accordingly, accurate evaluation of acute surgical pain is difficult for PACU patients in spite of severe postoperative pain. Therefore, pain evaluation is clinically important and challenging in PACU. The pain evaluation tool should be simple and easy to understand for accurate assessment. Among the most commonly used pain assessment methods are numerical rating scale(NRS), visual analogue scale(VAS) and verbal rating scale(VRS). These three methods have proved valid for clinical situations in many studies. VRS appears to be easier to understand than the other two methods for patients in PACU. The purpose of this study is to compare NRS and VRS in PACU patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Jin-Tae Kim

Seoul, Select, 110-744, South Korea

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients who underwent general anesthesia
  • The American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classification system : class 1, 2, 3

Exclusion criteria

  • The American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classification system : class 4, 5

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain measurement by the numerical rating scale

    Time frame: 5 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit

    Patients verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)".

    0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

  2. Pain measurement by the numerical rating scale

    Time frame: 20 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit

    Patients verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)" 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

  3. Pain measurement by the numerical rating scale

    Time frame: 40 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit

    Patients verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)" 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

  4. Pain measurement by the verbal rating scale

    Time frame: 5 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit

    Patients verbally requested to answer which of the four categories you belong to : no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain

  5. Pain measurement by the verbal rating scale

    Time frame: 20 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit

    Patients verbally requested to answer which of the four categories you belong to : no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain

  6. Pain measurement by the verbal rating scale

    Time frame: 40 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit

    Patients verbally requested to answer which of the four categories you belong to : no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain

  7. nonresponse rate of the numerical rating scale

    Time frame: 1 year

    the rate of assessment failures among the total number of assessment

  8. nonresponse rate of the verbal rating scale

    Time frame: 1 year

    the rate of assessment failures among the total number of assessment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Study of Verbal Rating Scale and Numerical Rating Scale in Post Anesthesia Care Unit

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 7, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 22, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.