Adalimumab
DrugAdministration of adalimumab with optimisation either 80 mg every 14 days by subcutaneous injection, or the same dose of 40 mg every 7 days.
NCT Number: NCT06180382
A substantial fraction of IBD patients with an initial response to infliximab or adalimumab later experience re-emerging active disease despite ongoing anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) agents maintenance therapy. The optimal intervention in patients with secondary loss-of-response (LOR) is still poorly defined, as there are still scant data on how best to choose the next intervention from among dose-intensification, switch to another anti-TNF or switch out of the anti-TNF class. Moreover, according to STRIDE 2 recommendations and CALM study, optimize patients based solely on lack of biological remission (CRP, calprotectin) can be discuss. If CALM study has showed that the intervention arm based on regular monitoring fecal calprotectin, CRP and/or CDAI to optimize patients under adalimumab was significantly associated to an increase rate of mucosal healing that the standard of care strategy based on only clinical activity, TDM was not available to guide drug optimization strategy.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
APHP - Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, PARIS, France
To address these issues, for IFX or ADA therapy, several studies have proposed some algorithms according to which interventions are based on a combined assessment of IFX or ADA drug level and antibodies-to-IFX or ADA (ATI or AAA) levels at the time of therapeutic failure. Thus, IFX or ADA levels, classified as therapeutic or sub-therapeutic, and detectable or undetectable antibodies, are used to assess if LOR is likely due to immunogenicity, to non-immune-mediated pharmacokinetic problems or due to pharmacodynamic issues, and to guide interventions accordingly.
In the last AGA recommendations, the authors suggested that in case of secondary LOR under anti TNF drug with therapeutic levels to switch to another class (such as vedolizumab). However, recent studies showed that optimization of dose regimen of the same anti-TNF in these patients may still be associated with clinical response in 25% of patients. Indeed, in a recent bicentric, retrospective and non-randomized study, the investigators showed that IBD patients under ADA maintenance therapy who experience a secondary loss of response and in whom trough levels are >4.9µg/mL, swapping to another class was significantly better than optimizing ADA, in term of time without discontinuation of treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Administration of adalimumab with optimisation either 80 mg every 14 days by subcutaneous injection, or the same dose of 40 mg every 7 days.
Strategy B: administration of vedolizumab 300mg by infusion at baseline, 14 days, 42 days and 60 days, followed by a dose of 108mg every fortnight by subcutaneous injection.
Time frame: Week 24
The primary objective will be to compare the proportion of clinical and biomarker remission (composite score) in the two groups of CD patients by 24 weeks after inclusion.
Time frame: Weeks 0; 24
To compare the proportion of deep remissions, the composite score is :
Time frame: Weeks 0; 24
A patient is considered to be in clinical remission if they present:
CDAI is the Crohn's disease activity score most commonly used in clinical trials. A CDAI below 150 corresponds to inactive Crohn's disease; between 150 and 450 to active Crohn's disease; above 450 to severe Crohn's disease.
Time frame: Week 24
Biomarkers are considered to be standardised if the following are observed
Time frame: Week 24
Biomarkers are considered to be standardised if the following are observed
Time frame: Week 24
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
The CDEIS ranges from 0 to 44 0: no lesions 44: most severe lesions Endoscopic remission defined by a CDEIS ≤ 7
Time frame: Week 24
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
Time frame: Week 24
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
Time frame: Week 24
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
The cut-off points for the MaRIA score are as follows:
moderate disease: ≥7 severe disease: ≥11
Time frame: Week 24
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
Time frame: Weeks : 24; 52
Compare treatment failure at week 24 or week 52 in the 2 groups.
Treatment failure is defined as:
Time frame: Week 24
Compare the percentage of adverse events in both arms at week 52
Time frame: Week 24
Symptomatic remission at week 24 is a composite criterion measured by PRO2 defined as: Stool frequency (SF) < 3 with abdominal pain score (AP) < 2 at week 24; AND absence of therapeutic failure between inclusion and week 24.
Time frame: Weeks : 0; 24
Compare evolution of IBDQ-32 in the two groups of patients between inclusion and week 24.
The IBDQ-32 questionnaire consists of 32 questions. Each question is answered on a scale from 1 to 7, with 1 being the lowest score and 7 the highest. Adding up the different scores gives a total score, ranging from 32 (worst score) to 224 (best score). The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Weeks : 12; 52
Compare rates of clinical and biomarker remission at week 12 and week 52.
Time frame: Week 24
Rate of Mucosal remission at week 24. Mucosal remission is definied by ;
Time frame: Week 52
Analyze the CDST score for prediction of remission under vedolizumab and adalimumab optimization.
A CDST score :
Time frame: Week 52
Compare the efficacy of each strategy based on baseline serum ADA levels, classified into three groups: Pharmacodynamic failure: Therapeutic level of ADA in blood (> 7.5 µg/mL) Pharmacokinetic failure: Subtherapeutic level of ADA in blood (< 7.5 µg/mL) Immunogenic failure (undetectable serum ADA level with the presence of anti-ADA antibodies >50 ng/mL).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Mathilde BARRAU, MD
CONTACT
(0)477829626 ext. +33
Sandra COURNIER, project manager
CONTACT
(0)477127652 ext. +33
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Other
Comparison of Vedolizumab Treatment to Adalimumab Dose Intensification in Crohn's Disease Patients With Loss of Response or Biomarker Activity to Adalimumab on First Line With Therapeutic Drug Concentration: A Randomized, Multicentre, Controlled Trial
Acronym: VEDIAN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06581328
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06226883
Crohn Disease, Crohn's Disease
Lancaster, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06430801
Crohn Disease, Crohn's Disease
Dothan, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07545317
Crohn Disease, Crohn's Disease
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial Details