Yongin Severance Hospital
Yongin, Gyeonggi-do, 16995, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT04941638
Distal radial access (DRA) has recently introduced and previous studies have demonstrated that it is feasible option, showing several advantages including less bleeding and access-site complications over proximal radial access (PRA). Previous study reported the feasibility of DRA as an alternative option for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients without major complication. However, comparison study of each vascular access for primary PCI have not been conducted until now. Here, The investigators aim to compare the DRA, PRA and femoral access (FA), in terms of feasibility and safety, in patients with STEMI.
This is a retrospective study with patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI between March 2020 to May 2021. The primary outcome of this study is the access-site complication including major bleeding requiring transfusion or surgery, hematoma and arterial occlusion.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Yongin, Gyeonggi-do, 16995, South Korea
Recently, DRA has gained the interest of interventional cardiologists and previous studies have demonstrated several advantages including patient and operator comfort, shorter hemostasis duration, less bleeding, and access-site complications over PRA. More recently, randomized trial demonstrated that DRA prevents radial artery occlusion after the procedure compared with PRA. From this perspective, DRA could be considered an alternative access route for primary PCI in selected STEMI patients using potent P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor or prasugrel, or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Vascular access for primary PCI in patients with STEMI
Other names: Proximal radial access, Femoral access
Time frame: 1 month
puncture site related complication
Time frame: Through procedure
The success rate (%) of vascular puncture
Time frame: Through procedure
Success rate (%) = Successful primary PCI / All PCI procedures
Time frame: Through procedure
Puncture time = time interval from local anesthesia induction to successful sheath cannulation.
Door-to-wiring time = time elapsed from arrival of patient at the emergency department to guide wire passage through the lesion.
Yonsei University
Other
Comparison of Distal Radial, Proximal Radial and Femoral Access in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05605288
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Charleroi, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04573751
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Tomsk, Tomsk Oblast, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT05462730
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiovascular Diseases
Copenhagen, Capital Region, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05848674
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Belfast, Antrim, United Kingdom
View Trial Details