Ahmed Samy
Giza, 11231, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04080336
To compare the effect of vaginal dinoprostone versus vaginal misoprostol administered before the copper intrauterine device(IUD) insertion in reducing IUD inertion pain and the difficulty in inserting the IUD in nulliparous women.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
Giza, 11231, Egypt
Long-acting reversible contraception methods are highly effective methods for reduction of the unplanned pregnancy rate worldwide. The intrauterine device is a single procedure that provides reliable, effective and long term contraception for many women. However, the insertion procedure can be associated with a troublesome degree of pain that prevent some women from choosing its use. Different interventions have been described to decrease pain perception during intrauterine device insertion with no agreement on an effective one.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1 vaginal tablet of dinoprostone (3mg) (prostin® E2, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium) inserted by the study nurse 3hours before IUD insertion.
1 vaginal tablet of misoprostol (200mcg) (Misotac®; Sigma Pharma, SAE, Egypt) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
one tablet of placebo inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
Time frame: 10 minutes
The difference in pain scores during intrauterine device insertion using visual analog scale from 0 to 10
Time frame: 10 minutes
The difference in pain scores during tenaculum application using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10
Time frame: 10 minutes
The difference in pain scores during sound insertion using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10
Time frame: 10 minutes
the ease of IUD insertion using ease of insertion score from 0 to 10 cm (0 = very easy insertion, 10 cm = terribly difficult insertion)
Time frame: 10 minutes
women's satisfaction level using satisfaction score from 0 to 10 cm where 0 denotes no satisfaction and 10 denotes maximum satisfaction
Cairo University
Other
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women:a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05700812
IUD, IUD Insertion Complication
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05594108
IUD Insertion Complication
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04963582
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Niğde, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03111342
Acute Pain, Anesthesia, Local
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details