Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06450015

Comparison of Vacuum Assisted Closure and Saline Dressing in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Conventionally diabetic foot is treated with moist wound dressing and antibiotics but recent studies show that VAC dressing gives better results as compared to conventional saline dressing in treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers. This may decrease amputations rate, work load on hospitals, hospital stay, repeated hospital admissions, unemployment and can improve patient's quality of life. Objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of Vacuum Assisted Closure therapy with saline dressing in management of diabetic foot ulcers in terms of granulation tissue formation and wound healing.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Children Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, 42000, Pakistan

About this study

it was a randomized Controlled Trial done in department of Surgery, Mayo Hospital,vLahore, Pakistan from January 2022 to July 2022. Patients divided in two groups, in the VAC group (Group A), the wound bed was filled with a saline soaked gauze piece after it is thoroughly cleaned. VAC was applied by placing sterile pads in two layers with a 16Fr Ryle's tube placed between the two layers and then the wound was sealed by a sterile transparent polyurethane sheet. The tube was connected to a wall mounted suction device and the pressure was set at -125 mmHg. In the Saline group (Group B), normal saline dressing was given. This consists of placing a saline soaked gauze piece over the wound bed after cleaning the wound. Patients were assessed and followed for wound healing. The primary outcome parameter was time taken to complete wound healing. Secondary outcome parameters were granulation tissue formation using a visual score and complication of bleeding, pain, and infection. Only healthy granulation tissue which appears pink was considered for scoring assessment. Infection was assessed by wound culture sensitivity which was sent every week.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • • Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients between the ages of 18 and 60
  • Patients of both genders
  • Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients whose ulcers are smaller than 15 cm in diameter.

Exclusion criteria

  • • Coagulopathy
  • Venous diseases
  • Foot Ulcers with underlying Osteomyelitis
  • Charcot's joint
  • Peripheral Vascular Diseases
  • Patients with Wegener's Grade IV
  • Involving both feet
  • Patients with HIV and Chronic Liver Disease

Treatment and study plan

Vacuum Assisted Closure

Device

VAC applied after debridement and saline packing

Saline Dressing

Other

Wound was managed by saline dressing

Primary outcomes

  1. time to wound healing

    Time frame: 1 month

    total time for wound healing was assessed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Lahore

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jun 10, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 10, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.