Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07148518

Comparison of Upper and Lower Limb Maximal Exercise Capacities and Arterial Stiffness in Patients With CAD

Coronary artery disease (CAD) significantly increases mortality rates in both developed and developing countries. In this condition, the impairment of arterial blood circulation leads to insufficient blood supply to the myocardium during both rest and exercise, resulting in symptoms such as angina pectoris, dyspnea, and fatigue. Patients, particularly due to their fear of experiencing angina pectoris, tend to adopt a sedentary lifestyle. This situation contributes to exercise intolerance and a reduction in exercise capacity among individuals with CAD. A review of the literature reveals a lack of studies investigating upper and lower extremity exercise capacity and the physiological responses during exercise testing in patients with CAD. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare arterial stiffness, muscle oxygenation, respiratory muscle fatigue, energy expenditure, perceived dyspnea, and fatigue during upper and lower extremity exercise testing in patients with coronary artery disease.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Gazi University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Ankara, Çankaya 06490

Ankara, Çankaya, 06490, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Meral BOŞNAK GÜÇLÜ, Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+903122162647

Naciye SEVİM, Pt.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90(539)7713761

About this study

As a consequence of atherosclerosis progresses with aging, the lumen of the arteries narrows and the arterial wall thickens. In patients with coronary artery disease, this process impairs arterial blood flow, resulting in insufficient blood supply to the myocardium. Consequently, due to the inability to meet the oxygen demands of the heart muscle both at rest and during exercise, patients experience symptoms such as angina pectoris, dyspnea, and fatigue. Particularly, fear of developing angina pectoris during physical activity leads patients to develop kinesiophobia and adopt a sedentary lifestyle. This condition further reduces their exercise capacity. In the literature, several studies have assessed the exercise capacity of these patients; however, these studies have predominantly utilized treadmill or cycle ergometers to evaluate lower extremity exercise capacity, and no study has been found that specifically investigates upper extremity exercise capacity. Considering that the upper extremities are used more frequently than the lower extremities during daily living activities, it is of particular importance to evaluate the upper extremity exercise capacity of patients. Moreover, upper extremity exercise testing provides an alternative means of assessment for patients with coronary artery disease who are unable to participate in lower extremity exercise tests due to neurological, vascular, or orthopedic problems. Compared to the lower extremities, the active muscle groups engaged during upper extremity exercise testing are smaller, which leads to lower metabolic demand and reduced peak oxygen consumption. This results in a lower cardiopulmonary workload during the exercise test. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate and compare upper and lower extremity exercise capacities, as well as the physiological responses elicited during exercise testing, in patients with coronary artery disease.

The primary aim of the study is to compare upper and lower extremity exercise capacities and arterial stiffness levels during exercise testing in patients with coronary artery disease.

The secondary aim of the study is to evaluate muscle oxygenation, energy expenditure, and the perception of dyspnea and fatigue during upper and lower extremity exercise testing in patients with coronary artery disease.

The primary outcomes are upper and lower maximal exercise capacities (Cardiopulmonary exercise tests) and arterial stiffness during cardiopulmonary exercise tests (Arteriograph) device).

Secondary outcomes are muscle oxygenation (Near-infrared spectroscopy) device, respiratory muscle fatigue (mouth pressure device), energy consumption (multi sensor activity device), the perception of dyspnea (Modified Borg Scale (MBS)) and fatigue (MBS).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-85 with coronary artery disease diagnosed by conventional or CT angiography
  • Clinically stable
  • Willing to participate

Exclusion criteria

  • Heart failure diagnosis
  • Moderate/severe valvular heart disease
  • Orthopedic, neurological, or pulmonary conditions limiting exercise testing/capacity
  • Contraindications per ACSM guidelines
  • Prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal Exercise Capacity

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Maximal Exercise capacity will be evaluated with Cardiopulmonary Exercise testing. The Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing will be applied according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) criteria.

  2. Arterial Stiffness [carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV)]

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Arterial stiffness will be non-invasively evaluated with using the SphygmoCor XCEL® device, which has established validity and reliability. The device will measure carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) along with pulse values.

  3. Arterial Stiffness [augmentation index (AIx)]

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Arterial stiffness will be non-invasively evaluated with using the SphygmoCor XCEL® device, which has established validity and reliability. The device will measure augmentation index (AIx) along with pulse values.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peripheral Muscle Oxygenation

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Peripheral muscle oxygen will be measured by near-infrared spectrometry. The device probes will be placed on the upper, lower extremities and trunk for both tests. The device allows to display of the percentage of oxygen, the concentration of oxyhemoglobin, and deoxyhemoglobin, the difference between oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin, and the total hemoglobin. These parameters will be evaluated in our study.

  2. Energy Consumption

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Energy consumption will be evaluated with the Multi sensor activity monitor. The patient wear the multi sensor physical activity monitor over the triceps muscle of the non-dominant arm during CPETs. Energy consumption (joule / day) will be measured with the multi-sensor physical activity monitor.

  3. Peripheral Muscle Strength

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Isometric peripheral muscle strength will be measured with a portable hand dynamometer. Measurements will be repeated on the shoulder abductors and knee extensors three times on the right and left.

  4. Respiratory Muscle Strength

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Maximal inspiratory (MIP) and maximal expiratory (MEP) pressures expressing respiratory muscle strength were measured using a portable mouth pressure measuring device according to ATS and ERS criteria.

  5. Respiratory Muscle Fatigue

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Respiratory muscle fatigue in patients will be assessed both before and immediately after upper and lower extremity cardiopulmonary exercise testing by measuring maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) using a mouth pressure measurement device in accordance with ATS/ERS criteria. Prior to the tests, measurements will be repeated at least five times until the difference between the two highest MIP values is less than 5% or 5 cmH₂O. Immediately after the tests, at least three measurements will be performed until the difference between the two best MIP values is less than 5% or 5 cmH₂O.

  6. Pulmonary Function (Forced vital capacity (FVC))

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, forced vital capacity (FVC)was evaluated.

  7. Pulmonary Function (Forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1))

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) was evaluated.

  8. Pulmonary Function (FEV1/FVC)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, FEV1/FVC was evaluated.

  9. Pulmonary Function (Flow rate 25-75% of forced expiratory volume (FEF25-75%))

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, Flow rate 25-75% of forced expiratory volume (FEF25-75%)was evaluated.

  10. Pulmonary Function (Peak flow rate (PEF))

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, peak flow rate (PEF) was evaluated.

  11. Physical Activity Level

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Physical activity will be evaluated with the Multi sensor activity monitor. The patient will wear the multisensor physical activity monitor over the triceps muscle of the non-dominant arm for 4 continuous days. The patient will be informed about removing the device while taking a bath. Physical activity level will be measured with the multi-sensor physical activity monitor.

  12. Chronotropic Response Assessment

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Chronotropic response assessment will be evaluated through exercise testing using the chronotropic index, which is calculated based on the maximal heart rate achieved during the exercise test and the resting heart rate.

  13. Dyspnea Perception

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Dyspnea perception will be evaluated with Modified Borg Scale. The Modified Borg scale is a subjective scale that scores 0-10 for breathlessness and fatigue at rest and/or during activity. The lowest 0 points "not at all" the highest 10 points "very severe" means shortness of breath.

  14. Fatigue Perception

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Fatigue perception will be evaluated with Modified Borg Scale. The Modified Borg scale is a subjective scale that scores 0-10 for breathlessness and fatigue at rest and/or during activity. The lowest 0 points "not at all" the highest 10 points "very severe" means fatigue.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Meral BOŞNAK GÜÇLÜ, Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90(312)2162647

Naciye SEVİM, Pt.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90(539)7713761

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gazi University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Upper and Lower Limb Maximal Exercise Capacities, Arterial Stiffness, Muscle Oxygenation and Energy Consumption During Tests in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 29, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.