Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01296412

Comparison of Two Treatment Regimens (Sitagliptin Versus Liraglutide) on Participants Who Failed to Achieve Good Glucose Control on Metformin Alone (MK-0431-403)

This study is being done to compare the effectiveness and safety of two treatment paradigms (oral sitagliptin with or without glimepiride versus liraglutide with or without increased dosing) for the treatment of participants with Type 2 Diabetes that is not adequately controlled with metformin alone. The primary hypothesis postulated that the mean change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in participants treated with a sitagliptin-based treatment is non-inferior to that of participants treated with a liraglutide-based

treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–79 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • On stable dose of metformin monotherapy at a dose of at least 1500 mg per day for at least 12 weeks and a hemoglobin A1C ≥7.0% and ≤11.0%.
  • Capable of using a liraglutide pen device.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of Type 1 Diabetes mellitus.
  • Use of any oral antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) besides metformin, within the prior 12 weeks of screening.
  • Cardiovascular disorders within the past 3 months including acute coronary syndrome or new or worsening symptoms of coronary heart disease, coronary artery intervention, stroke, or transient ischemic neurological disorder.
  • Impaired liver function.
  • Impaired kidney function.
  • History of malignancy or clinically important hematological disorder that requires disease-specific treatment (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery) or, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to recur during the duration of the study.
  • History of leukemia, lymphoma, aplastic anemia, myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic diseases, thrombocytopenia, or malignant melanoma, regardless of the time since treatment.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant or donate eggs within the projected duration of the study.
  • Participation in another study with an investigational drug or device within 12 weeks prior to screening.
  • History of hypersensitivity or any contraindication to sitagliptin, liraglutide, glimepiride, or metformin based upon the labels of the country of the investigational site.
  • Participation in a weight loss program and not yet in maintenance phase, or starting of a weight loss medication (such as orlistat or phentermine) within the prior 8 weeks.
  • Surgery within the prior 4 weeks or major surgery planned during the study.
  • Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2).
  • User of recreational or illicit drugs or recent history (within the last year) of drug abuse or increased alcohol consumption.

Treatment and study plan

Sitagliptin

Drug

100 mg tablet, orally, once daily.

Other names: MK-0431, Januvia®, Tesavel®, Xelevia®, Ristaben®

liraglutide

Drug

0.6 mg by subcutaneous (pen) injection, once daily, on Days 1-7; up-titrated on Day 8 to 1.2 mg daily. At Week 12, dose may be increased to 1.8 mg once daily for participants who did not meet protocol-specified glycemic goals.

Other names: Victoza®

Glimepiride

Drug

starting dose of 1 mg tablet (up-titrated as needed), once daily, as needed, after Week 12.

Other names: Amaryl®

metformin

Drug

metformin tablets at a dose of ≥1500 mg per day

Other names: Fortamet®, Glucophage®, Glucophage® XR, Glumetza®, Riomet®, Metgluco®, Glycoran®

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

    A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

    Change from baseline at Week 26 is defined as Week 26 minus Week 0.

  2. Percentage of Participants Reaching A1C Goal of <7.0%

    Time frame: Week 26

  3. Percentage of Participants Reaching A1C Goal of <6.5%

    Time frame: Week 26

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a Sitagliptin-Based Treatment Paradigm to a Liraglutide-Based Treatment Paradigm in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Monotherapy

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Feb 15, 2011
Registry last updated
Jun 9, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.