Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07038837

Comparison of Two Strategies for Administering the R21-Matrix M Vaccine in a Context of Seasonal Malaria Transmission in Chad

This is a two-arm, cluster-randomised, phase IV trial conducted in Chad to assess the protective efficacy and impact in real-life conditions of a new strategy for administering the R21/MM malaria vaccine, synchronized within a seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign, among children living in areas of high seasonal malaria transmission.

In this study, a cluster is defined as the catchment area of a primary care health centre. In Chad, each catchment area is known as a 'zone of responsibility' (French: Zone de Responsibilité' [ZR]).

Twenty-six (26) of the total 27 ZRs in the districts of Moïssala and Dembo will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 4-dose (3 primary doses + 1 booster) R21/MM schedule either (1) integrated into the routine EPI vaccination program (the "Routine" control arm), or (2) synchronized with an annual seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign (the "Synchronized" intervention arm).

Malaria incidence: R21/MM effectiveness will be assessed using the incidence of biologically confirmed clinical malaria (trial primary endpoint). The incidence of clinical malaria will be determined through enhanced surveillance of malaria cases in health centres and hospitals over a 17-month period (August 2025 - December 2026).

Coverage surveys: Cross-sectional surveys (cluster sampling) will be carried out to measure R21/MM vaccine coverage, SMC coverage, coverage of other malaria prevention measures, and coverage of other EPI vaccines.

Nested case-control study: A sub-sample of children admitted to Moïssala District Hospital with severe clinical malaria will be offered the opportunity to participate in a nested case-control study designed to estimate the individual protective efficacy of R21/MM against severe malaria.

Aditionnaly, the INTEGREVAC ancillary study's objective is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of the synchronised vaccination strategy in the context of the ongoing COSAV-R21 trial, to inform policy decisions for the effective deployment of malaria vaccines in SMC implementation areas.

Methodology and planned work:

(i) A qualitative study using in-depth interviews (IDIs) and group discussions with key stakeholders at the national, health facility, and community levels, including caregivers of children eligible for vaccination, in Chad, at several points during the trial. We will explore stakeholders' and beneficiaries' perceptions and experiences of the synchronised SMC vaccination strategy (trial intervention arm) compared to age-based vaccine administration under the routine immunisation programme (trial control arm), as well as considerations for implementing these strategies. Interviews with healthcare providers, including those administering R21 and SMC, and community members will assess the feasibility of implementing the integrated vaccination strategy via SMC.

(ii) An economic evaluation including a cost-effectiveness analysis and a nested equity analysis will be conducted. The economic evaluation will include a cost analysis to carefully identify and measure the additional costs associated with adding malaria vaccination to the EPI delivery platform and, separately, to the SMC delivery channel. Analysis of key cost drivers will enable us to identify potential efficiency savings, provide evidence for country funding requests (e.g., to GAVI and the Global Fund) and for the malaria vaccine strategy budgeting/planning process. Cost-effectiveness and equity analyses of each vaccine delivery strategy will provide evidence to help national programmes plan future malaria vaccine delivery and inform global guidance and on methods of delivering these vaccines, while providing valuable evidence on the real-world cost-effectiveness of malaria vaccination.

(iii) Impact modelling will estimate the costs, impact, and cost-effectiveness of scaling up the intervention approach to the whole of Chad, under different temporal and spatial scenarios.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

6 month–59 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Medecin sans Frontières

Moïssala, Mandoul Region, Chad

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Antoinette Mbailamen Demian

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Cédric Benodji Djerabé

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Dabsou Guidaoussou

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Jessica Sayyad Hilario

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mahamat Saleh Issakha DIAR

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Ouattara San Maurice

CONTACT

[email protected]

+235 85 15 76 18

Ouattara San Maurice

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • • Routine arm
  • Aged 6 to 11 months at the time of the first R21/MM vaccination (dose 1).
  • Residing in a village participating in the study and randomized to the routine arm.
  • Oral consent provided by the child's parent/guardian.
  • Synchronised arm

<!-- -->

  • Aged 6 to 59 months at the time of the first R21/MM vaccination (dose 1) during the first 3 rounds of SMC (2025).
  • Residing in a village participating in the study and randomized to the synchronized arm.
  • Oral consent provided by the child's parent/guardian.

Exclusion criteria

  • Exclusion criteria for both arms according to Chad national EPI guidelines

Malaria vaccine is not recommended for children with known severe hypersensitivity:

  • To a previous dose of a malaria vaccine
  • To a previous dose of hepatitis B vaccine
  • One of the components of the R21/MM vaccine

Mild illness - including respiratory tract infections, mild diarrhoea and fever below 38.5° C - is not a contraindication to R21/MM vaccination. Malnutrition and being HIV-seropositive are also not contraindications to R21/MM vaccination.

Treatment and study plan

"Synchronised" arm (intervention)

Other

Vaccines received together with CPS

Primary outcomes

  1. Malaria incidence in children who were aged 6-11 months when receiving their first dose R21/MM

    Time frame: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)

    To assess whether the R21/MM vaccine synchronized with SMC is non-inferior in preventing malaria (based on malaria incidence) compared to R21/MM administered as part of routine EPI in children who were aged 6-11 months when receiving their first dose R21

Secondary outcomes

  1. Malaria incidence

    Time frame: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)

    Incidence of clinical malaria (biologically confirmed by RDT) in each study arm among children aged 6-59 months, irrespective of R21/MM vaccination status

  2. R21/MM vaccination coverage

    Time frame: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)

    Proportion of children having received the appropriate number of doses for their age

  3. Coverage of other malaria prevention measures

    Time frame: From enrolment to month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)

    SMC coverage: average number of doses received per child and proportion of children receiving 0 and 5 doses

  4. Coverage of other malaria prevention measures

    Time frame: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)

    Proportion of children possessing, and proportion of children using, a long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) on the day before completing the coverage survey questionnaire

  5. Coverage of other EPI antigens

    Time frame: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)

    o Proportion of age-eligible children vaccinated against measles-1 and measles-2.

  6. Protective efficacy against severe malaria

    Time frame: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)

    Protective efficacy of vaccination with R21/MM will be measured at the individual level against severe malaria confirmed by RDT and microscopy. The protective efficacy will be calculated from the relative risk (RR) of developing severe malaria in vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

  7. Proportional morbidity

    Time frame: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)

    o Proportion of all-cause morbidity registered at health centres attributed to uncomplicated malaria

  8. R21/MM safety

    Time frame: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)

    Frequency of reported serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events following immunization (AEFI), Serious AEFIs and reported adverse events of special interest (AESIs) following R21/MM vaccination

Other outcomes

  1. Acceptability of the synchronized strategy

    Time frame: from month 6 to month 24

    Acceptability of R21 vaccination synchronized with SMC together with factors that promote or hinder the completeness of the R21 schedule. Views of policy makers, healthcare providers and caregivers collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions.

  2. Feasibility of the synchronized strategy

    Time frame: from Month 6 to Month 24

    Feasibility of administering 4 doses of R21 via SMC vs. the EPI platform assessed through qualitative interviews and focus group discussions

  3. Cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: From first enrolment to 24 months

    Costs to beneficiaries : Unit costs borne by beneficiaries (children and their guardians/parents) for R21 vacicnation, SMC, treatment of malaria episodes if the child has suffered one, per study arm (total cost of malaria prevention and treatment).

    Provider-related costs (including the health system, the research project and implementation partners) incurred in R21 vaccination by study arm.

    Differential cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per malaria case prevented by the intervention (malaria vaccination via SMC) compared to the control (R21 vaccination via EPI.

    The ratio of these total costs per unit of effectiveness (malaria case averted, Disavility-adjusted life year) defines cost-effectiveness.

  4. Fidelity of implementation of R21 vaccine delivery

    Time frame: From 6 months to 24 months

    We will document how the R21 vaccine administration was implemented in practice. Factors considered will include vaccine availability, accessibility of vaccination sites, staff training, community engagement efforts, adherence to vaccination schedules, quality and satisfaction with services, and any adaptations made. Data will be collected through desk review of programmatic documents, quantitative questionnaires and qualitative interviews.

  5. Equity

    Time frame: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)

    Explore the equity of each strategy from the perspective of wealth/poverty status and gender/sex- of vaccinated (or unvaccinated) children in Dembo and Moïssala R21 vaccination coverage (including children who have not received any doses and children who are fully vaccinated) will be presented by wealth quintile and separately by sex/gender between study arms Questions on assets and household composition will be asked during the cross-sectional household coverage surveys

  6. Impact modelling

    Time frame: From Month 18 to Month 36

    Assess, over time and based on historical data, the impact of malaria vaccination and SMC on the malaria burdeb at the district level in Moïssala and at the subnational level, using mathematical models parameterised with data obtained during the CoSAV-R21 trial.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jessica SAYYAD, Dr

CONTACT

[email protected]

+331 40 21 55 55

San Maurice OUATTARA

CONTACT

[email protected]

+235 85 15 76 18

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Epicentre

Other

Collaborators

  • Chad Ministry of Public Health Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI)
  • Epicentre, Paris, France and Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara, Uganda
  • Expertise France
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
  • MSF Médecins Sans Frontières France
  • National Malaria Control Program

Registry information

Official study title

Cluster Randomised Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Malaria Incidence When Implementing R21/Matrix-M Synchronized With Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention Distribution Versus R21/Matrix-M Given Routinely Through the EPI in Two Health Districts in Chad (CoSAV-R21)

Acronym: COSAV-R21

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 26, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.