Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05684796

Comparison of Two Pulmonary Embolism Treatments

The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with anticoagulation alone versus anticoagulation and mechanical aspiration thrombectomy with the Indigo Aspiration System for the treatment of intermediate-high risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-80 years old
  • Clinical signs and symptoms consistent with acute PE with duration of 14 days or less
  • Objectively confirmed acute PE, based on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) imaging showing a filling defect in at least one main or proximal lobar pulmonary artery
  • Classification of intermediate high-risk PE as demonstrated by right ventricular dysfunction with RV/LV ratio ≥1.0 on CTPA and elevated cardiac biomarkers, including cardiac troponin, BNP, and/or NT-pro BNP above the upper limit of normal
  • Jugular or femoral access deemed suitable to accommodate pulmonary artery intervention with the Indigo Aspiration System
  • Informed consent is obtained from either the patient or legally authorized representative (LAR)

Exclusion criteria

  • Administration of thrombolytic agents or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist within 30 days prior to baseline imaging
  • Hemodynamic instability with any of the following present:
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Obstructive shock or persistent hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) <90 mmHg or an acute drop in systolic BP ≥40 mmHg for >15 min, or requiring vasopressor or inotropic support to achieve a systolic BP ≥90 mmHg
  • Patients on ECMO
  • National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 ≥9
  • History, imaging or hemodynamic findings consistent with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) diagnosis
  • Imaging evidence or other evidence that suggests, in the opinion of the Investigator, that catheter-based intervention is not appropriate for the patient
  • Allergy, hypersensitivity, or heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
  • Contraindication or sensitivity to iodinated intravascular contrast that cannot be adequately premedicated
  • <45 mL/min creatinine clearance
  • Severe active infection (e.g. sepsis) requiring treatment at time of enrollment
  • Active bleeding or disorders contraindicating anticoagulant therapy
  • Hemoglobin <10 g/dL
  • Platelets <100,000/μL
  • INR >3
  • Cardiovascular or pulmonary surgery within last 7 days
  • Primary brain or metastatic brain cancer
  • Life expectancy <90 days
  • Pregnancy
  • Intracardiac thrombus (right atrium, right ventricle clot in transit) or thrombus in the inferior vena cava identified on baseline imaging
  • Current participation in another investigational drug or device trial that may confound the results of this trial. Studies requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational but have since become commercially available are not considered investigational studies.
  • Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, precludes the patient from appropriate consent, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the trial, including compliance with follow-up requirements, or that could impact the scientific integrity of the trial

Treatment and study plan

anticoagulation

Drug

Anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)

Mechanical aspiration thrombectomy

Device

Mechanical aspiration thrombectomy with the Indigo Aspiration System.

Other names: Indigo Aspiration System

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in RV/LV ratio

    Time frame: 48 hours post-randomization

    Change in RV/LV ratio at 48 hours on original therapy as assessed by computerized tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Major Adverse Events

    Time frame: within 7 days post-randomization

    Major adverse events (MAEs) within 7 days: a composite of clinical deterioration requiring escalation of care, PE-related mortality, symptomatic recurrent PE, or major bleeding

  2. Functional Outcome Assessment with the 6-minute walk test

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    Functional outcome as assessed by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) through 90 days. The 6-minute walk test measures distance walked in meters, with longer distances being better.

  3. Functional Outcome Assessment with the New York Heart Association Classification

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    Functional outcome as assessed by the New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) through 90 days. The New York Heart Association classification ranges from Class I-IV, with higher classifications being worse.

  4. Functional Outcome Assessment with the Post Venous Thromboembolism Functional Status scale

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    Functional outcome as assessed by the Post Venous Thromboembolism Functional Status (PVFS) scale through 90 days. The Post Venous Thromboembolism Functional Status scale ranges from 0-5, with higher scores being worse.

  5. Functional Outcome Assessment with the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    Functional outcome as assessed by the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) through 90 days. The modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale ranges from 0-4, with higher scores being worse.

  6. Functional Outcome Assessment with the Borg Scale

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    Functional outcome as assessed by the Borg Scale through 90 days. The Borg Scale ranges from 0-10, with higher scores being worse.

  7. Quality of Life Assessment with the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    Quality of Life (QoL), as assessed by the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire (PEmb-QoL) through 90 days. The Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire measures 6 dimensions, with higher scores being worse.

  8. Quality of Life Assessment with the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    Quality of Life (QoL), as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire through 90 days. The EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire measures 5 dimensions, with higher scores being worse.

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale is part of the questionnaire and ranges from 0-100, with higher scores being better.

  9. All-cause Mortality

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    All-cause mortality within 90 days

  10. PE-related Mortality

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    PE-related mortality within 90 days

  11. Symptomatic PE Recurrence

    Time frame: within 90 days post-randomization

    Symptomatic PE recurrence within 90 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Penumbra Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

STORM-PE: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Anticoagulation Alone vs Anticoagulation Plus Mechanical Aspiration With the Indigo® Aspiration System for the Treatment of Intermediate High Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 13, 2023
Registry last updated
Nov 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.