Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, III. Medizinische Klinik
Mannheim, 68167, Germany
NCT Number: NCT01668498
80 - 90 % of the patients treated with anti-EGFR antibodies (panitumumab or cetuximab) experience skin toxicity, mostly acne like skin rash.
A standardized treatment of skin rash is neither established as standard arm for clinical trials nor as guideline for the treatment of skin toxicity in clinical practice. While an improvement of QoL has been demonstrated for panitumumab and cetuximab in comparison to best supportive care the data basis for patient related outcomes regarding skin toxicity deriving from randomized trials is still small.
Recent surveys among German oncologist revealed that physicians are reluctant to use oral antibiotics as preemptive treatment . Only 19 out of 110 oncologists stated that they are thinking about using preemptive treatment in patients with acne-like skin rash.
Thus, in the present trial two main questions will be addressed:
(i) Can preemptive treatment with oral doxycycline be replaced by a sequential skin treatment strategy (i.e. local treatment with erythromycin followed by doxycycline in case of inefficacy = development of acne) without compromising treatment efficacy of skin toxicity treatment? (ii) Comparison of general and skin related QoL between both treatment arms.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Mannheim, 68167, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparison of efficacy of Arm A erythromycin cream 2% daily at bedtime (doxycycline 100mg b.i.d.if skin toxicity CTC° ≥2) and Arm B doxycycline 100mg b.i.d. in patients with Metastatic Colorectal cancer (Ras wild-type)being treated with panitumumab.
Other names: Aknemycin
Comparison of efficacy of Arm A erythromycin cream 2% daily at bedtime (doxycycline 100mg b.i.d.if skin toxicity CTC° ≥2) and Arm B doxycycline 100mg b.i.d. in patients with Metastatic Colorectal cancer (Ras wild-type)being treated with panitumumab.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Percentage of patients developing no skin toxicity ≥ grade 2 at any time during their first 8-weeks of treatment with panitumumab.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Quality of life will be assessed by standardized skin-related (DLQI) and global quality of life (EORTC QLQ C30.
For correlation analyses between the different quality of life scores, the non-parametric test according to Spearman will preferably be applied.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Assess different skin toxicity grading scales (i.e. NCI CTC v. 4.0; WoMo score; MESTT)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Description of correlation between skin-related and global quality of life using EORTC-QLQ C30 and SF-36.
Time frame: from week 8 to 12
Describe the development of late skin toxicity after 8 weeks
Time frame: 8 weeks
Rate of skin-toxicity induced dose reductions (including withdrawal) of panitumumab
AIO-Studien-gGmbH
Other
Comparison of Two Preemptive Treatment Strategies of Panitumumab Mediated Skin Toxicity and Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Ras-wildtype Colorectal Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.