Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00988234

Comparison of Two Position for Ultrasound Guided Lumbar Plexus and Sciatic Nerve Block

In the present study, the investigators will test the effect of two position on posterior lumbar plexus and subgluteal or sub-greater trochanter sciatic nerve block.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Anaesthesiology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China

About this study

The posterior lumbar plexus block approach was described approximately 30 years ago, using surface anatomical landmarks and a loss-of-resistance technique, but over the years it was almost abandoned for its low successful rate, the huge numbers of adverse effects and its difficulties to be performed. The introduction of the nerve stimulator and ultrasound guided technique in recent years increased the success rate in various peripheral nerve blocks and decreased adverse effects. Ultrasound guided LPB as well as sciatic nerve block technique in a small patient population resulting in a encouraging result, but published clinical data on optimal patient position for ultrasound-guided LPB are limited. We designed this prospective randomized study to compare the success rate, time of performance and complications of ultrasound guided posterior lumbar plexus block as well as subgluteal or sub-greater trochanter sciatic nerve block under lateral decubitus position v.s. prone position.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 to 75 years old
  • elective unilateral lower limb surgery
  • ASA Physical Status ASA I-III

Exclusion criteria

  • age <18 or >75 year old
  • ASA Physical Status >ASA III
  • abnormal blood coagulation
  • infection near puncture place
  • nerve injury
  • bilateral lower limb surgery
  • patients with lumbar vertebral trauma
  • inability to be properly positioned
  • chronic narcotic therapy or illicit drug use

Treatment and study plan

SGPP

Procedure

ultrasound guided posterior lumbar plexus block and subgluteal sciatic nerve block under prone position

SGTPP

Procedure

ultrasound guided posterior lumbar plexus block and sub-greater trochanter approach under prone position

SGLP

Procedure

ultrasound guided posterior lumbar plexus block and subgluteal sciatic nerve block under lateral decubitus position

SGTLP

Procedure

ultrasound guided posterior lumbar plexus block and sub-greater trochanter approach under lateral decubitus position

Primary outcomes

  1. Block success defined as loss of sensation to pinprick in each of the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve distributions when measured 30 min after block performance.

    Time frame: 30min

  2. Motor blockade was evaluated by assessing the strength of knee extension (femoral nerve), thigh adduction (obturator nerve), and plantar flexion and dorsiflexion of the ankle (sciatic nerve) 30 min after block performance.

    Time frame: 30min

Secondary outcomes

  1. block execution time, depth of the nerve, needle depth, duration of the sensory and motor blockade, complications such as inadvertent needle puncture of epidural space, dural puncture, peritoneal puncture, and kidney or ureter puncture and nerve injury.

    Time frame: within 48h

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Lateral Decubitus Position Versus Prone Position for Ultrasound Guided Posterior Lumbar Plexus Block and Sciatic Nerve Block

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Oct 2, 2009
Registry last updated
Feb 17, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.