Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06649526

Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes

The aim of this study is to answer the question of whether direct laryngoscopy can be performed with videolaryngoscopes. How do the videos of the laryngoscopes provide images directly in laryngoscopy? Primary objective: To compare the images of Hugemed and Mcgrath videolarinygoscope in direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy secondary objective: to compare the effects on haemodynamic response Participants :people who are not expected to have difficult intubation

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Anesthesia

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital Cevizli D-100 Güney Yanyol, No:47 Kartal Istanbul Turkey

Istanbul, 34870, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Direct and indirect images of hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscope during intubation, haemodynamic responses, procedure time will be compared

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

To be between 18 -65 years old Mallampati score I-II Cormack-Lehane score I-II ASA physical status I-II who required endotracheal intubation for elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

Pregnancy Mallampati score III-IV Cormack-Lehane score III-IV ASA physical score III-IV sternomental distance < 12.5 cm mandibular-hyoid distance < 6 cm

Treatment and study plan

endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscope

Other

The present study will compare the images of two different VLs with Macintosh blades (the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Hugemed videolaryngoscope) in both indirect (screen images) and direct (images viewed through the mouth) laryngoscopy.

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management

    Time frame: 3 months

    Videolaryngoscopy (VL) is a frequently used method in airway management to improve the success of tracheal intubation in recent years. VLs have a miniature video camera at the tip of the blades which allows indirect visualisation of the glottis (1,2,3).

    The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) recommends that a VL should be available and used for all patients with a particularly difficult airway and for whom intubation is planned In recent years, a number of VLs have emerged that offer several advantages over direct laryngoscopy.It is aimed to compare direct and indirect images of mcgrath and hugemed videolaryngoscope.

  2. Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management

    Time frame: 3 months

    The principal objective of this study was to undertake a comparative analysis of the images produced by two distinct VLs during direct and indirect laryngoscopy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Oct 18, 2024
Registry last updated
Oct 18, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.