Prisma Health-Upstate Fertility Center of the Caroliinas
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06990841
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the LensHooke CA0 device lowers DNA fragmentation in sperm samples compared to a gradient/swim-up technique.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Does the LensHooke® CA0 device reduce DNA fragmentation compared to the gradient/swim-up technique? 2. Does the LensHooke® CA0 device improve concentration, motility, and morphology compared to the gradient/swim-up technique? 3. Is sibling embryo fertilization and development the same? 4. Are pregnancy rates different between the 2 groups?
1 semen sample will be split between the 2 treatment techniques. Half of the partner's egg cohort will be injected via intra-cytoplasmic sperm using sperm processed by one technique and the other half of the cohort will be injected by the sperm processed by the other technique. Both methods will look at DNA fragmentation, concentration, motility, and morphology of the sperm. Both methods will be compared in the resulting embryos looking at fertilization, embryo development and pregnancy rates.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–34 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
comparison of DNA damage between the 2 interventions and subsequent embryo development and pregnancy rates
Time frame: From enrollment until day after sample collection, approximately 1 month
The method is based on the Sperm Chromatin Dispersion (SCD) test (Fernández et al., J. Androl 24:59-66, 2003; Fertil Steril 84:833-842, 2005). Intact unfixed spermatozoa (fresh, frozen/unthawed, diluted or neat samples) are immersed in an inert agarose microgel on a pretreated slide. An initial acid treatment denatures DNA in those sperm cells with fragmented DNA. Following this, the lysing solution removes most of the nuclear proteins, and in the absence of massive DNA breakage produces nucleoids with large halos of spreading DNA loops, emerging from a central core. However, the nucleoids from spermatozoa with fragmented DNA either do not show a dispersion halo or the halo is minimal. Slides are stained with Wright's stain. A minimum of 300 sperm per sample will be counted. The percentage of sperm with fragmented DNA will be calculated by dividing the sperm with small and no halos (fragmented sperm) by the total number of sperm counted.
Time frame: From enrollment until day after sample collection, approximately 1 month
Assessed using a sperm class analyzer - SCA (CASA system) for sperm count. Semen samples will be loaded into 20 microliter depth fixed volume slides. Slides will be placed on the Microoptics SCA machine. Videos will be captured of fields until at least 200 motile sperm are captured. Concentration will be analyzed by counting the number of sperm within each field, corrected for the depth of the chamber, and multipled by the volume of the sample. Concentrations between fields will not vary by more than 15%.
Time frame: From enrollment until day after sample collection, approximately 1 month
Assessed using a sperm class analyzer - SCA (CASA system) for sperm motility. Semen samples will be loaded into 20 microliter depth fixed volume slides. Slides will be placed on the Microoptics SCA machine. Videos will be captured of fields until at least 200 motile sperm are captured. Motility will be calculated as the number of motile sperm counted divided by the total number of sperm counted. Types of motility will be noted according to WHO semen analysis groupings, hyperactivation, and kinetic motion parameters.
Time frame: From enrollment until day after sample collection, approximately 1 month
10 uL volumes of sperm samples will be placed on pre-stained morphology slides using methylene blue/cresyl violet stain. A minimum of 200 sperm will be counted and assessed for normal vs abnormal sperm morphology using Kruger strict criteria. Percentage of normal sperm will be assessed my dividing the number of normal sperm by the total number of sperm counted.
Time frame: From enrollment until a week after sample collection, approximately 5 weeks
The number of fertilized eggs (zygotes) will be divided by the number of eggs inseminated
Time frame: From enrollment until a week after sample collection, approximately 5 weeks
Embryo development will be monitored using a time-lapse incubator. A score will be generated based on when the embryos meets developmental time points. The embryo will receive 2 points for each time point it successfully completes with expected parameters. Embryos will receive 1 point for each time point it completes but outside the expected time parameters. i.e. if an embryo has the first cleavage between 23-25 hours it will receive 2 points. If it cleaves earlier than 23 hours or later than 25 hours it will receive 1 point. The total score an embryo receives will be tallied from the time of insemination until the embryo is frozen.
Time frame: From enrollment until a week after sample collection, approximately 5 weeks
All embryos will be graded according to a 3-part grading scale at the time of cryopreservation between days 5 and 7 of culture. The embryo will be given a number score of 1-6 based on the embryo's size, size of the blastocoel fluid cavity, and whether or not it is inside, hatching out, or completely hatched out the zona. Each embryo will get a letter grade for the quality of the inner cell mass either A, B, C, or D. Each embryo will get a second letter grade for the quality of the trophectoderm A, B, C, or D.
Time frame: From enrollment until a delivery of infant, up to 18 months
Calculated by the number of patients that become pregnant (assessed by the presence of a fetal heartbeat 5-6 weeks following embryo transfer) divided by the total number of embryos transferred. Live birth will be calculated by the number of patients that give birth divided by the number of embryos transferred.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Patti Parker
CONTACT
Richard J Kordus, PhD
CONTACT
Richard Kordus, PhD, HCLD (ABB)
Other
A Prospective Comparison of Two Different Sperm Preparation Techniques on the Prescence of DNA Fragmentation and Embryo Development
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03908736
DNA Damage, Immune System Diseases
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04372914
Behavior, DNA Damage
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04081428
DNA Damage, Genital Diseases
Edinburgh, Mid Lothian, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07144891
DNA Damage
View Trial Details