CooperVision Inc.
Pleasanton, California, 94588, United States
NCT Number: NCT03779503
The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the two study lenses.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pleasanton, California, 94588, United States
This study was a randomised, double-masked, crossover, bilateral dispensing study, controlled by cross-comparison. Fifty-five subjects will wear each lens brand for approximately one week in random order. Lenses were worn on a daily wear, daily disposable basis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
midafilcon A 1 day daily disposable contact lens
somofilcon A 1 day daily disposable contact lens
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of horizontal centration of lens (extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely temporal)
Time frame: One Week
Assessment of horizontal centration of lens (extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely temporal)
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of vertical centration of lens (extremely inferior, slightly inferior, optimum, slightly superior, extremely superior)
Time frame: One Week
Assessment of vertical centration of lens (extremely inferior, slightly inferior, optimum, slightly superior, extremely superior)
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of corneal coverage of lens (extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive)
Time frame: One Week
Assessment of corneal coverage of lens (extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive)
Time frame: Baseline
Lens movement assessed per corneal coverage (extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive)
Time frame: One Week
Lens movement assessed per corneal coverage (extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive)
Time frame: Baseline
Subjects will score on visual analogue scale for vision (0 -100) (0 - Unacceptable, 20 - Very poor, 40 - Poor, 60 - Good, 80 - Very Good, 100 - Excellent)
Time frame: One week
Subjects will score on visual analogue scale for Vision (0 -100) (0 - Unacceptable, 20 - Very poor, 40 - Poor, 60 - Good, 80 - Very Good, 100 - Excellent)
CooperVision, Inc.
Industry
A Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06751225
Astigmatism Bilateral
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05580575
Astigmatism, Astigmatism Bilateral
Medina, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04297969
Accommodation Disorder, Amblyopia Bilateral
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03684928
Astigmatism Bilateral
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details