Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04731480

Comparison of TIVA by Closed Loop Anaesthesia Delivery System Versus Target Controlled Infusion Device

Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is now being adopted as a preferred technique for providing GA because of its various inherent advantages like reduced PONV incidence, improved quality of recovery post GA, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant action, anti-neoplastic activity, analgesic action, and absence of greenhouse effect. Over the years propofol-TIVA delivery has become more methodical due to the use of target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems. The current TCI technology has evolved with the introduction of the 'open' TCI concept wherein syringes of any configuration can be attached to the TCI-pumps having pre-programmed propofol PK-PD models. The two most commonly use propofol PK-PD models are the Marsh and Schneider models targeting the propofol blood plasma concentration and effect site concentration in the brain respectively. Automated delivery of propofol using computer-controlled closed loop anaesthesia device delivers propofol based on patient's frontal cortex electrical activity as determined by bispectral index (BIS). Evaluation of anaesthesia delivery by these systems has shown that they deliver propofol and maintain depth of anaesthesia with far more precision as compared to manual administration. A recent advance in propofol delivery has been the development of automated closed loop anaesthesia delivery system. These devices deliver propofol based on patient's frontal cortex electrical activity as determined by bispectral index (BIS).Closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS) is an indigenously developed continuous automated intravenous infusion system which delivers propofol based on patients' EEG profile (BIS) feedback. Currently there is no data available comparing the efficacy of TCI delivered propofol versus automated propofol delivery systems. The investigators hypothesize that automated propofol delivery by CLADS will provide more consistent anaesthesia depth maintenance as compared to TCI delivered propofol. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the efficiency of CLADS-driven propofol TIVA versus TCI administered in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with respect to adequacy of anaesthesia depth maintenance, performance characteristic of propofol delivery system hemodynamic stability, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative sedation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Nitin Sethi, New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Inhalation anaesthetic were backbone of general anaesthesia (GA) practice till the time an intravenous anaesthetic, propofol was introduced in early 1970's and its commercial availability in 1980's, which led to the resurgence in the practice of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA). TIVA is now being adopted as a preferred technique for providing GA because of scores of inherent advantages, like, reduced PONV incidence, improved quality of post-anaesthesia recovery, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant action, anti-neoplastic activity, analgesic action, and absence of greenhouse effect among many others.Over the years propofol-TIVA delivery has become more methodical and precise owing to the use of target controlled infusion (TCI) systems. TCI systems use propofol pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacodynamics (PD) models which predict either the plasma or the effect-site propofol concentration required for maintenance of GA steady-state during surgery. The 'Diprifusor' TCI-system was the first commercially available propofol TCI-system. The 'Diprifusor' TCI-system was a 'closed' TCI-system which required a special electronically tagged pre-filled propofol syringe to be attached to the TCI-pump. The current TCI technology has evolved with the introduction of the 'open' TCI concept wherein syringes of any configuration can be attached to the TCI-pumps having pre-programmed propofol PK-PD models. Currently, the two most commonly used PK-PD models that drive TCI systems to deliver TIVA are the 'Marsh' and 'Schneider' models. Whereas Marsh model targets blood plasma concentration of propofol for anaesthesia maintenance, the Schneider model targets effect-site concentration in the brain. A recent advance in propofol TIVA delivery has been the development of automated closed loop anaesthesia delivery system. These devices deliver propofol based ascertaining patient's frontal cortex electrical activity as determined by bispectral index (BIS) score and then keeping the values within a pre-assigned range consistent with robust GA depth. Closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS) is an indigenously developed patented (502/DEL/2003) computer-controlled anaesthesia delivery system. CLADS typically works with feedback loop information elicited by BIS monitoring and delivers propofol TIVA to the patient via a non-TCI automated infusion pump. This basis of CLADS is the control algorithm based on the relationship between diverse rates of propofol infusion and the processed EEG variable. Although propofol delivery by CLADS is based on pharmacokinetic model but for greater precision and efficient administration, its delivery trigger is directly linked with feedback mechanism involving patient's EEG profile as monitored by the BIS scores. In a multicentre study on evaluation of anaesthesia delivery by CLADS, it was shown that CLADS maintains depth of anaesthesia with far more precision as compared to manual administration. Queerly while TCI & CLADS technology evolved over a period of time; there is no data available comparing the efficacy of TCI delivered propofol-TIVA versus automated propofol delivery systems. Based on additional feedback loop incorporated to the PK-PD model the investigators contend that automated propofol TIVA as administered by CLADS is likely to be superior to TCI system in achieving and sustaining anaesthesia depth. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the efficacy of CLADS-driven propofol TIVA versus TCI administered propofol TIVA in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with respect to: adequacy of anaesthesia depth maintenance (primary objective), performance characteristic of propofol delivery system, propofol requirement, hemodynamic stability, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative sedation (secondary objectives).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • aged 18-65 years
  • ASA physical status I-II
  • undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery of minimum 60-minutes duration

Exclusion criteria

  • Uncompensated cardiovascular disease (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, atrio-ventricular block, sinus bradycardia, congenital heart disease, reduced LV compliance, diastolic dysfunction)
  • Hepato-renal insufficiency
  • Uncontrolled endocrinology disease (e.g. diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism)
  • Known allergy/hypersensitivity to the study drug
  • Drug dependence/substance abuse
  • Requirement of postoperative ventilation
  • Refusal to informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Propofol

Drug

Propofol administration rate will be controlled by a feedback loop facilitated by BIS monitoring using the closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS). A BIS value of 50 will be used as the target point for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia.

Primary outcomes

  1. Anaesthesia depth consistency

    Time frame: From end of surgery till 8 hours intraoperatively

    It will be determined by the percentage of the anaesthesia time during which the BIS remained +/- 10 of the target BIS of 50

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performance characteristic of propofol delivery system

    Time frame: From end of surgery till 10-hours intraoperatively

    It will be determined using the Varvel criteria parameter :median performance error (MDPE). This parameter is calculated by the computer software which analyses the intraoperative BIS data. This parameter have no unit of measurement. Its just a abstract number.

  2. Performance characteristic of propofol delivery system

    Time frame: From end of surgery till 10-hours intraoperatively

    It will be determined using the Varvel criteria parameter: median absolute performance error (MDAPE).This parameter is calculated by the computer software which analyses the intraoperative BIS data. This parameter have no unit of measurement. Its just a abstract number.

  3. Performance characteristic of propofol delivery system

    Time frame: From end of surgery till 10-hours intraoperatively

    It will be determined using the Varvel criteria parameter: wobble. This parameter is calculated by the computer software which analyses the intraoperative BIS data. This parameter have no unit of measurement. Its just a abstract number..

  4. Performance characteristic of propofol delivery system

    Time frame: From end of surgery till 10-hours intraoperatively

    It will be determined using the Varvel criteria parameter: global score. It is calculated using the formula Median absolute performance error + wobble / percentage of the anesthesia time during which the BIS remained +/- 10 of the target BIS of 50. This parameter have no unit of measurement. Its just a abstract number..

  5. Propofol induction dose (mg/kg)

    Time frame: From start of propofol injection till 2-minutes intraoperatively

    Dose of propofol required for induction of anaesthesia

  6. Propofol maintenance dose (mg/kg/hr)

    Time frame: From 2-minutes intraoperatively till 10-hours intraoperatively

    Dose of propofol required for maintenance of anaesthesia

  7. Intra-operative heart Rate (beats per minute)

    Time frame: From beginning of anaesthesia till 10 hours intraoperatively

    Comparison of intra-operative heart rate between the study arms will be done

  8. Intra-operative systolic , diastolic, and mean blood pressure (mmHg)

    Time frame: From beginning of anaesthesia till 10 hours intraoperatively

    Comparison of intra-operative blood pressure- systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure between the study arms will be done

  9. Early recovery from anaesthesia

    Time frame: From end of anaesthesia till 20-minutes postoperatively

    Time taken by the patient to open his/her eyes after discontinuation of anaesthesia will be noted

  10. Early recovery from anaesthesia

    Time frame: From end of anaesthesia till 20-minutes postoperatively

    Time taken for tracheal extubation after discontinuation of anaesthesia will be noted

  11. Postoperative sedation

    Time frame: From end of anaesthesia till 24-hours postoperatively

    Will be assessed using Modified Observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale. The scale has a maximum value of '5', which refers to a fully awake patient and a minimum value of '0' which refers to a deeply sedated patient.

  12. Induction Time

    Time frame: From beginning of anesthesia till 5-minutes intraoperatively

    Time taken for for induction of anesthesia i.e. time taken from starting propofol infusion till a target BIS value of 50 is achieved

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of Propofol Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Administered by Closed Loop Anaesthesia Delivery System Versus Target Controlled Infusion Device in Adults Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Study

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 1, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 14, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.