Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
NCT Number: NCT04145089
This study compares the time taken to intubate between Cmac video laryngoscopy with Glidescope video laryngoscopy in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years old.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me3 year–12 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
This study aims to determine whether are both devices comparable to each other in terms of intubation time and Cormack Lehane view in paediatric patients with normal airway undergoing elective surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
usage of said devices according to manual
Time frame: 5 minutes
Time taken from insertion of specified laryngoscope blade to lip until presence of capnography tracing
Time frame: 5 minutes
grade from 1-4 by operator's assesment
Time frame: 5 minutes
i.e external laryngeal manipulation, bougie assisted
Time frame: 5 minutes
i.e lip injury, desaturations
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Other
Comparative Study of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac Video Laryngoscopy With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06712732
Paediatric Airway
View Trial Details