Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06340542

Comparison of Thoracic Mobility Exercise Versus Manual Release Technique in Minimizing Upper Back Pain

Methodology: study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of thoracic mobility exercise and manual release technique in terms of pain intensity, thoracic mobility, muscle strength and improving disability.

Study Design: Study was conducted in Service unit of Department of Physiotherapy at university of peradeniya. Undergraduates who are currently having upper back pain for more than seven days was selected as sample. It is a randomized Controlled trail, Double blinded study. Participants allowed randomly to both groups which are experimental group which will receive thoracic mobility exercises and control group which will receive myofascial release and joint mobilization treatment. Total sample size was 60.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–26 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Vithursha Sivakumar

Jaffna, Northern Province, 40001, Sri Lanka

About this study

Study Population: Undergraduates who are currently having upper back pain for more than seven days was selected as sample. Participants who was have sub-acute and chronic pain which means who will have pain more than a week or seven days will be selected as sample and who have subjected to any recent surgeries, recent fractures, accidents or injuries in upper back will be excluded from the study.

Study Setting:

Study was conducted in Service unit of department of Physiotherapy, University of Peradeniya.

Study Design:

This study is a Randomized Control Trial, Double- Blinded study. Participants and accessors was blinded. Participants was allocated allocated randomly in to two groups which are experimental group which receive thoracic mobility exercises and control group which will receive myofascial release and joint mobilization treatment.

Sample size was Calculated by using G*power 3.1.9.4 software by assigning power 80% effective size 0.5, type I error = 0.05 and type II error = 0.2. Therefore calculated sample size was 42. Drop down rate of participants is assigned as 25 %. Therefore final sample size which obtained was 60 (Kang, 2021). Simple Random Sampling was used as sampling technique as well as 30 Participants was randomly allocated to each group. Participant was allocated to the groups by using lottery method. Measurement tool contains two sections such as pre-test and post-test questionnaire. In Pre-test questionnaire, there are six sections which includes personal details of the participants, pain related questions, Measurement of range of motion at base line, muscle strength at base line and pain-self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) at base line.

In Post-test questionnaire, there are 4 sections which include, pain related questions mainly pain intensity after two weeks, muscle strength after two weeks, Range of motion after two weeks and pain-self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). Personal details of the participants will be collected separately for the concealed allocation and participants will be identified by code number Ethical approval will be obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Bangladesh Health Professional Institute. Written informed consent will be obtained from all the subjects who are willing to participate in the study. Participation in this research is entirely voluntary basis and the participants have the right to withdraw from the study at any time. Baseline outcome measures are demographic characteristics of participants such as age, gender, BMI, family size, bread winner of the family, monthly income and financial support for study; Pain duration; Pain intensity at present moment, sitting, forward bending, standing, walking, sleeping, transferring and pain when performing day to day activities; Range of Motion of thoraco-lumbar flexion and extension; Muscle strength of thoracic spine extensors and overall scale of Pain-Self- efficacy Questionnaire. After two weeks same outcome measures will be obtained other than demographic characteristics and pain duration Study Duration:This study will be conducted from July 2022 to July 2024, for two years with three months data collection

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergraduates who are currently having upper back pain for more than seven days will be selected as sample.
  • Participants who will have sub-acute and chronic pain which means who will have pain more than a week or seven days will be selected as sample

Exclusion criteria

  • Participant who have subjected to any recent surgeries, recent fractures, accidents or injuries in upper back will be excluded from the study.

Treatment and study plan

Thoracic mobility exercises

Other

Exercises which focus on improve the mobility of the spine especially thoracic region was administered to the patients in different position including quadruped and standing position.

Manual Release technique

Other

Interventions include release the muscle tension, trigger point release and reducing stiffness of spine was administered

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Time frame: at base line and after two weeks

    Visual Analogue Scale is used to measure the pain intensity in base line and after intervention in two groups in the following instances, present pain intensity and during sitting, forward bending, standing, walking, sleeping, transferring and performing day to day activities. Its 10 point grading scale, Here maximum value of the scale 10 indicates an unbearable pain and minimum value denotes no pain at all.

  2. Range of Motion

    Time frame: at baseline and after two weeks

    Range of Motion of thoraco-Lumbar Flexion and Extension (Tape Measurement). Normal range of Thoraco lumbar flexion in tape measurement 2.7 cm is normal and for extension 2.5cm is normal

  3. Muscle strength

    Time frame: at base line and after two week

    Muscle strength of spinal extensors examined by using Manual Muscle Test- Oxford Grading Scale. It is a 6 point grading scale which includes, 0 is considered as no contraction, 1 is palpable contraction, 2 movement with gravity eliminated, 3 is movement against gravity only, 4 movement against gravity with some resistance and 5 is movement against with full resistance

  4. Disability level - self perception

    Time frame: at baseline and after two week

    Pain-Self-Efficacy-Questionnaire is used to analyse how participants feel confident despite the pain. Total score is 60. If the total score indicates more than 45 patient has a stronger self efficacy believe to the pain and if its less than 30 weak or less self efficacy believe to the pain

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Dhaka

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of Thoracic Mobility Exercise Versus Manual Release Technique in Minimizing Mechanical Upper Back Pain Among Undergraduates in Sri Lanka

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2024
First posted
Apr 1, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 2, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.