Supraflex Cruz 60 Micron
Devicepercutaneous coronary intervention
NCT Number: NCT04500912
The study compares the outcome of the ultrathin stent strut Supraflex Cruz stent to the thin stent strut Ultimaster Tansei stent in a PCI population at high risk for bleeding (HBR).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Study design: An Investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized clinical trial in HBR patients receiving PCI with Supraflex Cruz or Ultimaster Tansei stents
Study population: 2 x 368 (736) patients, who undergo a PCI and are at high risk for bleeding (HBR).
Intervention: Patients are treated according to the randomized regimen at index PCI and at planned staged procedures. Either with the ultrathin stent strut Supraflex Cruz stent to the thin stent strut Ultimaster Tansei stent
DAPT treatment (combination and duration) is according to the Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for Myocardial Revascularization.
Follow-up is scheduled at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post index PCI procedure.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study:
The primary endpoint Net Adverse Clinical Endpoints (NACE) defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke and bleeding events defined as BARC 3 or 5 at 12 months follow-up after the index PCI.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients are eligible for inclusion into the study if the following criteria are met.
Major HBR criteria are the following:
Minor HBR criteria are the following:
Exclusion criteria
Patients are not eligible if any of the following applies:
percutaneous coronary intervention
percutaneous coronary intervention
Time frame: 1 year
The primary endpoint Net Adverse Clinical Endpoints (NACE) defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke and bleeding events defined as BARC 3 or 5 at 12 months follow-up after the index PCI.
Time frame: 1 year
Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke
Time frame: 1 year
Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (MCB) defined as a composite of type 2, 3 and 5 BARC bleeding events
Time frame: 1 year
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 1 year
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel and clinically indicated target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 1 year
The composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke
Time frame: 1 year
The composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and major bleed according to BARC 3 and 5
Time frame: 1 year
Stent thrombosis according to the ARC definitions
Time frame: 1 year
Myocardial infarction.
Time frame: 1 year
Urgent target vessel revascularization.
Time frame: 1 year
Non-target vessel revascularization.
Time frame: 1 year
Clinically indicated target vessel revascularization.
Time frame: 1 year
Bleeding events according to the BARC, TIMI and GUSTO classification
Time frame: 1 year
Transfusion rates both in patients with and/or without clinically detected over bleeding
Time frame: 1 year
Event rates according to the PRECISE-DAPT score
Time frame: At completion of the baseline PCI
Procedural success is defined as angiographic success with no in-hospital MACE, defined as death, MI with new Q-waves on electrocardiogram (ECG) or urgent target vessel revascularization (TVR) (including both repeat PCI and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)
Time frame: At discharge of baseline hospitalisation, on average 3 days
Device success (applying a lesion-level analysis)
Pieter C.Smits
Other
Comparison of the Supraflex Cruz 60 Micron Stent Strut Versus the Ultimaster Tansei 80 Micron Stent Strut in High Bleeding Risk PCI Population
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05490303
Cardiac Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06154473
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03113565
Cardiac Disease, Cardiac Surgery
Neuilly-sur-Seine, Île-de-France Region, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03098524
Atelectasis, Bleeding
Neuilly-sur-Seine, Île-de-France Region, France
View Trial Details