Agri İbrahim Cecen University
Ağrı, 042000, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06116123
Aim: This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of two types of mattresses with different support surfaces used in bedridden patients.
Method: The sample of this quasi-experimental study consisted of 60 patients according to the inclusion criteria. A group I and group II of 30 patients each were formed from the sampled patients. For the patients in group I, a bed with a cube/block system and vibration (massage) feature was used. For the patients in group II, a viscoelastic mattress was used. The data of the study were collected with the ''Patient Identification Form'', ''Braden Scale'', ''Pressure Wound Observation Form'' and ''Wound Measurement Chart''. Number-percentage distributions, Chi-square, Fisher's Exact Probability Test and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used to evaluate the data.
Implications for Clinical Practice: It was determined that the support surface used affected the pressure sore size and the mattress with cube/block system and vibration (massage) feature created smaller sized wounds in the sacrum, trochanter, malleolus and heel regions. In the sacrum, scapula, and heel regions, although not statistically significant in terms of wound stage and the number of patients who developed pressure sores, it was seen that the mattress with cube/block system and vibration (massage) feature was more effective.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ağrı, 042000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients with an odd number were assigned to group I, while those with an even number were allocated to group II. Patients in group I were provided with a pressure sore prevention bed featuring a support surface with vibration (massage) capabilities, a cube/block system creating a low-pressure area, and a ventilation system, routinely utilized in the unit. For group II patients, a viscoelastic pressure sore prevention mattress with an orthopedic support surface, routinely employed in the unit, was used.Within the first six hours after admission, patients in both groups underwent initial assessments using the Braden Scale to determine their pressure sore risk. Both groups were monitored for a maximum of four weeks, with daily pressure ulcer assessments conducted using the Pressure Ulcer Observation Form. Pressure sore area in both groups was calculated in square centimeters (cm2) using the Wound Measurement Ruler.
Time frame: Patients were followed up for four weeks.
The formation of pressure sores in patients will be prevented with a bed with cube/block system massage feature. The massage feature of the bed will be used for this. In addition, the pressure in the relevant area will be reduced by removing the cubes inside the bed.
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06509399
Nursing Caries, Pressure Ulcer
Bolu, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06294327
Decubitus Ulcer, Pressure Injury
Sint-Niklaas, East Flanders, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07255937
Arterial Leg Ulcer, Burns
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07586748
Cardiovascular Diseases, Embolism and Thrombosis
View Trial Details