Influenza vaccination
Biological0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Other names: FluBlok, Fluzone, rHA, rHA0, recombinant hemagglutinin, TIV
NCT Number: NCT00395174
The purpose of this study were to obtain additional evidence in support of the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) vaccine in an elderly population, and to establish non-inferiority of the immunogenicity of the rHA vaccine when compared with a licensed trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV). Another purpose was to provide a preliminary estimate of the relative efficacy of the two vaccines against culture-positive influenza-like illness during the subsequent epidemic.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Center of Vaccine Development, Univ. of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Annual influenza epidemics are associated with serious excess morbidity and mortality, particularly among the elderly. Licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIVs) have been shown to reduce hospitalization and death following influenza in this vulnerable population, but their efficacy is lower than that observed in younger, healthy populations. In addition, recent studies have questioned the level of effectiveness of TIV in the elderly, suggesting that cohort studies have overestimated the benefits of immunization with current TIV formulations in this age group. In view of these considerations, it is widely accepted that improved and alternative vaccines are needed for control of seasonal and pandemic influenza.
Currently available TIVs are prepared from viruses that are grown in embryonated hens' eggs. Alternative substrates for vaccine production are desirable in order to reduce the vulnerability of and to expand influenza vaccine supply. Recombinant DNA techniques allow for expression of the influenza hemagglutinin (rHA) by baculovirus vectors in insect cell cultures. Advantages of this technique include speed of production, absence of egg protein, and a highly purified product. Previous studies among healthy younger and older adults have confirmed that rHA vaccines are safe, well tolerated and immunogenic at dosages up to nine times higher than those contained in TIV. Dose-related increases in serum antibody levels after immunization also were observed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Other names: FluBlok, Fluzone, rHA, rHA0, recombinant hemagglutinin, TIV
Time frame: influenza season
Time frame: influenza season
Time frame: influenza season
Protein Sciences Corporation
Industry
Comparison of the Immunogenicity, Safety and Reactogenicity of FluBlok, Trivalent Recombinant Baculovirus-Expressed Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine, to a Licensed Egg-Grown Influenza Vaccine In Ambulatory Elderly Adults
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04794829
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07737106
Infections, Influenza
Bayan Nur, Inner Mongolia, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06518577
Infections, Influenza
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06560151
Infections, Influenza
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details