Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07490379

Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Home Versus in Hospital Settings in Patients With Depressive Episodes

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation method that modulates brain activity using low-intensity electrical current. Used in the treatment of depression, it is easily adaptable for both caregivers and patients, with good tolerance, under appropriate supervision.

Allowing patients to perform tDCS at home could address issues of access to care (distance from home, overall cost of care, lack of healthcare professionals, difficulty travelling for physical/psychological reasons, etc.). Studies on tDCS have highlighted the importance of regular clinical monitoring to ensure compliance and safety, which are essential factors for therapeutic efficacy.

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of tDCS performed at home versus in hospital in terms of effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms at 6 weeks post-treatment in patients with moderate to severe depression.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Clinique Mirambeau, Anglet, France

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men or women over the age of 18
  • Psychiatric diagnosis:
  • Presenting a depressive episode characterised according to DSM-5 criteria
  • MADRS score greater than or equal to 20, indicating moderate to severe depression
  • Indication and prescription of a course of tDCS treatment consisting of 20 sessions of 30 minutes at 2mA, at a rate of 2 sessions per day
  • Drug treatment:

o Failure of a maximum of 1 or 2 antidepressants taken successively or in combination for the current episode

  • Psychiatric follow-up: Receiving medical follow-up by a psychiatrist or referring physician
  • Ability to understand and cooperate:
  • Having a smartphone, computer or tablet (with internet connection and Bluetooth) to use the digital interface required to perform remote tDCS
  • Be deemed capable of understanding the nature of the study and participating in clinical follow-up
  • Informed consent: Have given written consent to participate in the research, after receiving oral and written information about the study.
  • Social affiliation: Be affiliated with a social security system

Exclusion criteria

  • Psychiatric or neurological diagnoses:
  • Chronic psychotic disorders or history of schizophrenia
  • Progressive neurological disorders (unstabilised epilepsy, brain tumour, recent stroke, severe head injury)
  • History or current treatment of neuromodulation
  • Any history of tDCS treatment, whether carried out in a clinical or research setting
  • Current treatment or history of rTMS and ECT sessions for the current episode
  • Presence of an active vagus nerve stimulation implant
  • Presence of a high risk of suicide. A risk of suicide will be considered high if the score on item 10 of the MADRS scale ("Suicidal Thoughts") is 4 or higher, and/or if there is active suicidal ideation accompanied by clinically identified intent or a plan
  • Addiction and substance use: Current substance use disorder other than nicotine or caffeine
  • Psychiatric comorbidities that may interfere with study participation, including: understanding information, adherence to the protocol, and completing CBT sessions.
  • Recent change in curative psychotropic treatment (antidepressant, mood stabiliser including lithium and anticonvulsants, mood-stabilising antipsychotic) in the month prior to inclusion.
  • Medical contraindication to stimulation:
  • Presence of a metallic or electronic implant in the skull or chest (pacemaker, neurostimulator, cochlear implant)
  • Skin lesion, irritation or wound on the electrode contact areas
  • History of epileptic seizures not related to an identified cause or not stabilised for more than 12 months
  • Current pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Women of childbearing age without effective contraception (hormonal or medical device)
  • A severe and/or progressive somatic condition requiring ongoing medical care that would interfere with participation in the study.
  • Limited ability to participate:
  • A significant cognitive impairment or sensory deficit that prevents understanding of instructions
  • Inability to safely perform tDCS at home, as defined by at least one of the following:
  • inability to understand or recall essential instructions regarding procedure and safety;
  • inability to perform, following initial guidance, the essential steps for setting up and starting the device;
  • lack of the minimum material conditions required at home to conduct the sessions.
  • Special legal or social situation:
  • Patients under guardianship, curatorship or judicial protection
  • Privation of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, Presence of a functional limitation to the independent performance of tDCS

Treatment and study plan

Distribution of study questionnaires

Other

The questionnaires will be administered to patients at DO, D10, and M2. MADRS/RSES/EQ-5D-5L/BDI/CRQ

tDCS sessions (D1-D10)

Other

Protocol: 2 mA, 30 min, 10 working days (Monday to Friday), 2 sessions/day

Monitoring tDCS appropriation

Other

During visits to the hospital, the nurse ensures that the patient knows how to use the device correctly.

Semi-structured interviews with patients

Other

The interviews will be conducted by telephone with patients participating in the study. The purpose of these interviews is to gather information for the qualitative aspect of the implementation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the non-inferiority of tDCS administered at home compared to in-hospital treatment in terms of effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms 6 weeks post-treatment, using the MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale).

    Time frame: 2 months

    The scale ranges from 0 to 60, with 60 representing the worst possible outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the response to treatment by comparing the two arms immediately post-treatment and at M2 (6 weeks post-treatment). This will be assessed by the change in the total MADRS scale score.

    Time frame: 2 Months

    The scale ranges from 0 to 60, with 60 representing the worst possible outcome.

  2. Evaluate the remission rate in each of the two arms immediately after treatment and at M2.

    Time frame: 2 months

  3. Compare the change in patient self-reported depressive symptoms using the BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory-II) in both study arms, measured immediately post-treatment and at M2 (6 weeks post-treatment).

    Time frame: 2 months

    The scale ranges from 0 to 3, where 3 representing the worst possible outcome.

  4. Assess the impact of tDCS on self-esteem using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) in both study arms, measured immediately post-treatment and at M2 (6 weeks post-treatment).

    Time frame: 2 months

    The scale ranges from 1 to 4, where 1 indicates "strongly disagree" and 4 indicates "strongly agree.

  5. Study patients' quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L after tDCS treatment in each of the two arms immediately after treatment and at M2.

    Time frame: 2 months

    The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the worst possible outcome.

  6. Assess the safety of the two tDCS administration modalities using the Comfort Rating Questionnaire (CRQ) in each of the two arms immediately after treatment.

    Time frame: 10 Days

    The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 10 representing the worst possible outcome.

  7. Compare efficiency from a collective perspective and over a two-month time horizon.

    Time frame: 2 months

    Incremental cost-utility ratio (cost per QALY) at 2 months.

  8. Analyse the financial impact of the rollout of tDCS at home (budget impact analysis over 5 years)

    Time frame: 2 months

  9. Determine the optimal implementation conditions for the effective deployment of tDCS at home across the following domain : Relevance

    Time frame: 2 months

    Qualitative analysis of data collected during semi-structured interviews with patients and their relatives regarding the suitability or unsuitability of the method of administering tDCS at home.

  10. Determine the optimal implementation conditions for the effective deployment of tDCS at home across the following domain : Acceptability

    Time frame: 2 months

    • Proportion of reasons for refusal among patients identified but not included following a log-based screening process, linked to a negative perception of tDCS.
    • Number of patients reporting discomfort during stimulation
    • Number of patients who withdrew after randomisation due to a negative experience of tDCS.
  11. Determine the optimal implementation conditions for the effective deployment of tDCS at home across the following domain : Fidelity

    Time frame: 2 months

    Ratio of the number of sessions completed to the number of sessions planned in each of the two groups. // Proportion of patients who discontinued the protocol before completion // Factors leading to deviations that resulted in the treatment being carried out over a longer period or in the tDCS stimulation treatment being discontinued.

  12. Determine the optimal implementation conditions for the effective deployment of tDCS at home across the following domain : Adoption

    Time frame: 2 months

    Proportion of individuals included among those identified. Description of the reasons for excluding patients who were identified but not included. Frequency of inclusions.

  13. Determine the optimal implementation conditions for the effective deployment of tDCS at home across the following domain : Implementation Costs (microcosting).

    Time frame: 2 months

  14. Determine the optimal implementation conditions for the effective deployment of tDCS at home across the following domain : Feasibility

    Time frame: 2 months

    Number of patients who completed the full course of tDCS treatment.

  15. Determine the optimal implementation conditions for the effective deployment of tDCS at home across the following domain: Reach (Sociodemographic profile of the patients included)

    Time frame: 2 months

  16. Determine the optimal implementation conditions for the effective deployment of tDCS at home across the following domain : Sustainability (Integration of the scheme into the facility's care programme)

    Time frame: 2 months

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Damiens Choneau

CONTACT

[email protected]

02 53 48 28 35 ext. +33

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins
  • Sooma Medical

Registry information

Official study title

CAPUCINOO - Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Home Versus in Hospital Settings in Patients With Depressive Episodes: Non-inferiority Study, the Impact of Nursing Follow-up and Implementation of the Care Pathway

Acronym: CAPUCINOO

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Mar 24, 2026
Registry last updated
May 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.