Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07233395

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dextrose Prolotherapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in Plantar Fasciitis

Plantar fasciitis is a degeneration of the plantar aponeurosis and is the most common cause of heel pain (11-15%). Although seen in both sexes, plantar fasciitis is more common in women, usually unilateral and bilateral in 30% of cases . The most widely accepted view regarding the formation of plantar fasciitis is that it is a degenerative process caused by myxoid degeneration, microtears, collagen necrosis, and angiofibroblastic hyperplasia, resulting from repetitive microtrauma to the plantar fascia, particularly at the calcaneal insertion site. It is not inflammatory . The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of prolotherapy, a regenerative treatment, and ESWT in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Plantar fasciitis is known as the most common cause of heel pain in adults. While its incidence increases between the ages of 40 and 60, it is more common in runners, those who work in positions requiring prolonged standing, overweight individuals, and those with certain biomechanical foot problems. Diagnosis of plantar fasciitis can be easily made through history and physical examination. Conservative methods are the first line of treatment. Local injections and ESWT are used in patients who fail to improve despite conservative treatment. ESWT and Prolotherapy are treatment methods that induce regeneration by creating a controlled inflammation. This prospective study aims to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and Prolotherapy, which have similar mechanisms of action, in the treatment of plantar fasciitis and to identify the more effective method.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of plantar fasciitis

Ages 18 to 75 years

Both male and female participants

Heel pain localized to the medial calcaneal tubercle for more than 3 months

Morning first-step pain and pain increasing with daily loading

Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent

Patients presenting to Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital

Exclusion criteria

Cardiac pacemaker

Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus

History of inflammatory rheumatic disease

Bleeding disorders

Use of anticoagulant medications other than aspirin

Allergy to dextrose

Previous foot or ankle surgery

Peripheral neuropathy

S1 radiculopathy in the same extremity

Local corticosteroid injection to the plantar fascia within the last 3 months

ESWT applied to the plantar fascia within the last 3 months

Physical therapy applied to the foot/ankle in the last 3 months

Cognitive dysfunction

Active infection at the planned injection site

-

Treatment and study plan

Dextrose prolotherapy

Procedure

Participants in this group will receive dextrose prolotherapy twice, at two-week intervals.

A 5 mL syringe containing 2.5 mL of 30% dextrose, 2 mL isotonic saline, and 0.5 mL 2% lidocaine (final 15% dextrose solution) will be injected into seven points around the plantar fascia origin under aseptic conditions.

Other names: Prolotherapy Injection

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)

Device

Participants in this group will receive extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) twice per week for a total of four sessions.

The treatment will be applied to the plantar fascia insertion area using a standard clinical shock wave therapy device.

Energy level, frequency, and pulse count will be set according to manufacturer recommendations and standard clinical protocols.

Other names: Shock Wave Therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Heel Pain Intensity (VAS Score)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    Heel pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome is the change in VAS score from baseline to week 12 in each treatment group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Foot Function Index (FFI) Total Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    Functional status will be assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI), which evaluates pain, disability, and activity limitation related to foot function. The total FFI score will be recorded at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. The secondary outcome is the change in FFI total score over time.

  2. Change in Roles and Maudsley Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    The Roles and Maudsley functional pain score will be used to evaluate treatment response. Patients grade their condition on a 4-point scale from "excellent" to "poor." Scores will be obtained at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Improvement in score indicates better clinical outcome.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

ZEYNEP KARAKUZU GÜNGÖR

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905077750375

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 18, 2025
Registry last updated
Nov 18, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.