Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05130372

Comparison of The Acute Effects of Different Stretching Methods on Ankle Joint Range In Healty Older Adults

Introduction: To compare the acute effects of different stretching methods on ankle joint range of motion (ROM) in older adults.

Methods: A total of 78 subjects aged 65 years and older were randomly divided into three groups. After the 5-minute walk, the randomly assigned method was applied. Static Stretching Group; static stretching in 3x30sec, PNF Stretching Group; PNF contract-relax in 3x30sec and Roller Massage Group; roller massage in 3x30sec was performed. Immediately after the application, 10 minutes and 20 minutes after application, the range of motion of the ankle joint was measured in the weight-bearing lunge position.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Izmir Provincial Health Directorate State Hospital, Izmir, Urla, Turkey (Türkiye)

Loading trial locations.

About this study

It is planned to single-blind, randomized controlled study with before-after measurements. Considering the acute effects of stretching exercise for ankle dorsiflexion in older women, the effect size was calculated as 1.02. According to this effect size, it was planned to recruit 26 people to each group with 95% confidence level and 95% power, and 78 people in total would participate in the study. Ethics committee approval of the study was received from Dokuz Eylul University Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee (with the decision number 2017/17-39 in the meeting dated 22.06.2017). The study was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki standards. The participants were informed about the study by the physiotherapist and all the participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study. The study included healthy and voluntary older adults aged 65 and over who were able to walk without using an assistive device, independent in their daily life activities, and scored 23 and above according to the mini-mental state test in the study. The exclusion criteria of the study were the presence of a neurological, orthopedic or cardiovascular disease affecting the lower extremity, pain or limitation of movement in the ankle joint, skin diseases, history of falling in the last 1 year, any problem that may prevent lying prone and participation in a regular exercise program. Individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of two different groups with the help of the Random Numbers Table. The study was terminated when the target number of participants (n=78) was reached. Static stretching was applied to the first group (n=26), PNF stretching to the second group (n=26), and roller massage to the third group (n=26). Individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of two different groups with the help of the Random Numbers Table. The study was terminated when the target number of participants (n=78) was reached. Static stretching was applied to the first group (n=26), PNF stretching to the second group (n=26), and roller massage to the third group (n=26). (Figure 1) After the stretching method to be applied was determined randomly, the participants were asked to walk for 5 minutes in a 50-meter corridor. After warming up with this light-paced walking, applied one of the three methods. Immediately after the application, 10 minutes and 20 minutes after application, the range of motion of the ankle joint was measured in the weight-bearing lunge position.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy and voluntary older adults aged 65 and over
  • Who were able to walk without using an assistive device,
  • Independent in their daily life activities
  • Who scored 23 and above according to the mini-mental state test.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of a neurological, orthopedic or cardiovascular disease affecting the lower extremity,
  • Pain or limitation of movement in the ankle joint,
  • Skin diseases,
  • History of falling in the last 1 year,
  • Any problem that may prevent lying prone
  • participation in a regular exercise program.

Treatment and study plan

Static Stretching Method Group

Other

Static stretching has been the most common stretching method applied to the ankle in healthy older adults, and different protocols have proven to increase ankle range of motion. In this study, the static stretching method was actively applied while standing.

PNF Stretching Method Group

Other

The contract-relax technique was used in the PNF stretching method.

Myofascial Relaxation Method Group- Roller Massage

Other

A theraband roller massager (Theraband®, The Hygenic Corporation, Akron, OH) was used for the myofascial relaxation method.

Primary outcomes

  1. Range of motion

    Time frame: Baseline

    The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.

  2. Range of motion

    Time frame: Immediately after application

    The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.

  3. Range of motion

    Time frame: 10 minutes after application

    The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.

  4. Range of motion

    Time frame: 20 minutes after application

    The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University

Other

Collaborators

  • Ceren Devrim Şahin
  • Nursen İlçin

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of The Acute Effects of Different Stretching Techniques on Ankle Joint Range of Motion In Healthy Older Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 23, 2021
Registry last updated
Nov 23, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.