Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00745147

Comparison of TCM and Laxatives for Adults With Chronic Constipation

The purpose of the study is to compare the therapeutic efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and maintenance effect between Chinese herbal formula and lactulose on chronic constipation in long-term care.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch

Douliu, Yun-Lin, 640, Taiwan

About this study

Although many people regard regular defecation as important factor to maintain healthy, constipation is still a common problem in general population. According to some surveys, constipation affects approximately 50% to 73% of nursing home residents. Because the symptoms cause serious impairment of life quality, laxatives are commonly prescribed for people and over-prescribing of laxatives is also common. Despite the large sums spent on laxatives, there have been few advances in laxative treatment in the last 50 years and there have been minimal research addressing the problem. Therefore constipation was labeled as "the neglected symptoms".

There is unsatisfactory effect by currently pharmacologic therapies and preventive strategies for constipation. Contrarily, they had abundant clinical experiences and medical records for constipation in traditional Chinese medicine. So we follow the worldly trend to do the research of integrative Chinese medicine and Western medicine since WHO launched the first global strategy on traditional and complementary/alternative medicine (TM/CAM) to assist countries to create a stronger evidence base of the TM/CAM products and practices.

The study will be performed under randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel design. The object of this study is the residents in nursing homes. After intake of Chinese herb, improving constipation and care quality, decreasing the need of enema or digital maneuver, minimizing the dosage of rescue laxatives and saving the medical expenditure will be expected.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • men and non-pregnant women who are at least 20 years of age
  • patients who have been adequately informed of the nature and risks of the study and who have given written informed consent prior to receiving study medication
  • the one who meet any one of the following three criteria: 1.RomeIII criteria; 2.at least once a week of enema/suppository use/digital maneuver in past three months; 3.laxative use in more than half time of last three months

Exclusion criteria

  • known severe renal or hepatic insufficiency,
  • known colorectal cancer, anal abscess, anal fistula, anal fissure, rectocele, inflammatory bowel diseases, or gastrointestinal obstruction;
  • unknown cause of gastrointestinal bleeding or acute infection
  • neuromuscular dystrophy or spinal cord injury induced constipation
  • history of drug abuser
  • unstable psychiatric disorders
  • women who are pregnant, as determined by a urine pregnancy test
  • use of an investigational drug (within 30days prior to enrolled)
  • known allergies to the component of study medication

Treatment and study plan

Chinese herbal formula (CCH1)

Drug

initial dose of 1.5/3.0/4.5gm herbal powder with 15/30/45ml placebo of duphalac, respectively, per day for mild/moderate/severe constipation, then titrated

Other names: TCM

Duphalac

Drug

initial dose of 15/30/45ml duphalac with 1.5/3.0/4.5gm placebo of herbal powder, respectively, per day for mild/moderate/severe constipation, then titrated

Other names: Laxative

Primary outcomes

  1. frequency of spontaneous bowel movement

    Time frame: every week

Secondary outcomes

  1. amount of rescue laxative use

    Time frame: every week

  2. stool consistency

    Time frame: every week

  3. stool amount

    Time frame: every week

  4. global assessment of efficacy

    Time frame: 2 months

  5. safety evaluation

    Time frame: every week

  6. frequency of enema/suppository use/digital maneuver

    Time frame: every week

  7. medical cost per spontaneous bowel movement

    Time frame: every week

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Chinese Herbal Formula and Lactulose for Adults With Chronic Constipation-a Randomized ,Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2010
First posted
Sep 3, 2008
Registry last updated
May 4, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.