Pubocervical fascia reconstruction
ProcedureSuturing type techniques on pubocervical fascia reconstruction at anterior compartment defects.
NCT Number: NCT05444023
Anterior colporrhaphy is the commonly performed surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. However the success rates of native tissue repair techniques for anterior vaginal prolapse range from %30-%70. According to a systematic review of the anterior colporrhaphy technique, there was no ideal procedure or guideline for gynecologists to perform. The investigators tried to compare pubocervical fascia suturing techniques with the ideal procedure type by determining step by step all parts of the surgery including the anesthesia type. The aim of the study will be to compare the pubocervical fascia reconstruction techniques in the management of anterior compartment defects (POP-Q >2) at 1 year and yearly up to 2 years.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Primary and secondary endpoints:
Primary outcome measures will be the subjective cure of prolapse ("absence or presence of a bulge in the vagina"), objective success with anatomic absence of advanced prolapse at POP-Q sites Ba, C and Bp defined as less than 1 cm individually and as a total.
Secondary outcome measures include all other parameters such as perioperative outcomes, patient satisfaction, quality of life outcomes, complications, scores on questionnaires, and reoperations.
The study protocol will be submitted to the institutional review boards of every participating study site and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants on enrolment.
Project design: The investigators will perform an international singlecentre single-blind randomized controlled trial by participating in our tertiary referral hospital.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Suturing type techniques on pubocervical fascia reconstruction at anterior compartment defects.
Time frame: Time Frame: 12 months after intervention
Provided by the patient's feeling of the "Absence of a bulge in the vagina"
Time frame: Time Frame: 12 months after intervention
Defined as anatomic absence of advanced prolapse at POP-Q sites Ba, C and Bp defined as less than 1 cm individually and as a total
Time frame: Time Frame: 12 months after intervention
This will be assessed using a validated questionnaire (Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire P-QoL) The questionnaire contains 9 domains. Each answer of the patient will have values that range between 1 to 4 or 1 to 5 for the 1st question only). (1 very good 4/5 very poor). There is no overall score. A symptomatic woman might have only one domain impaired and another one might have all domains impaired. We consider both of them symptomatic but in different or same aspects of quality of life. To differentiate different domains, it is important for the decision of our surgery (we will be careful in shortening and narrowing a vagina of a woman who had only a preoperative high (impaired) Personal relationships domain score and other domains in the normal range).
This will also help us in the follow up visits.
Time frame: Time Frame: 12 months after intervention
Recurrence rate
Time frame: Time Frame: 12 months after intervention
İnjury ( bowel, intestinal, blood vessel injuries)
Time frame: Time Frame: 12 months after intervention
The PISQ-12 is a self-adminestered questionnaire that evaluates sexual function of women with pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. The questionnaire has 12 items. Other than the first 4 questions that are scored from 4 to 0, all questions are scored from 0 to 4. The total score is calculated with totaling the score of each question. The maximum score is 48. Higher scores show good sexual functioning of women.
Time frame: Time Frame: 12 months after intervention
evaluating the impact of urinary incontinence
Time frame: Time Frame: 12 months after intervention
evaluating the bowel, bladder, or pelvic symptoms
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Other
Comparison of Suturing Technique Types on Pubocervical Fascia at Colporrhaphy Anterior for Cystocele Repair
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02890498
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Nîmes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06532292
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07554651
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Dnipro, Ukraine
View Trial DetailsNCT07552337
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Diyarbakır, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details