Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04957069

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Avulsion Fracture of the AT and Conventional ATR--a Retrospective Study

To compare the surgical outcomes between avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon and conventional Achilles tendon rupture, collected and analysed information of patients preoperatively and postoperatively.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

Include 30 patients with avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon and 30 patients with Achilles tendon rupture underwent surgical treatment in our institute. Collect and evaluate MRI, VAS, AOFAS, and FFI score preoperatively and postoperatively. Finally explore the surgical outcomes between avulsion fracture of the AT and conventional ATR.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon or Achilles tendon rupture

Exclusion criteria

  • neuromuscular related diseases
  • other injuries of ankle joint

Treatment and study plan

fixation

Procedure

double row fixation with 3-4 wire anchors

primary repair

Procedure

end-to-end repair

Primary outcomes

  1. MOCART

    Time frame: one year after sugery

    MOCART is a scoring system to evaluate the repair effect of cartilage injury.The minimum and maximum values of MOCART are 100 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a better outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. VAS

    Time frame: pre-surgery, one year after sugery

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is designed to present to the respondent a rating scale with minimum constraints. Respondents mark the location on the 10-centimeter line corresponding to the amount of pain they experienced. This gives them the greatest freedom to choose their pain's exact intensity. It also gives the maximum opportunity for each respondent to express a personal response style. The minimum and maximum values of VAS are 10 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  2. AOFAS

    Time frame: pre-surgery, one year after sugery

    The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score combines subjective scores of pain and function provided by the patient with objective scores based on the surgeon's physical examination of the patient (to assess sagittal motion, hindfoot motion, ankle-hindfoot stability and alignment of the ankle-hindfoot). The scale includes nine items that can be divided into three subscales (pain, function and alignment). The minimum and maximum values of AOFAS are 100 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a better outcome.

  3. FFI

    Time frame: pre-surgery, one year after sugery

    A Foot Function Index (FFI) was developed to measure the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales. Both total and sub-scale scores are produced. The FFI was examined for test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct and criterion validity. Each scale is from 0 (no pain or difficulty) to 10 (worst pain imaginable or so difficult it required help) .

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Peking University Third Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Avulsion Fracture of the Achilles Tendon and Conventional Achilles Tendon Rupture--a Retrospective Study

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jul 12, 2021
Registry last updated
Jul 12, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.