Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02218918

Comparison of Supervised Ground Walk Training and Treadmill Walk Training in COPD Patients

Pulmonary Rehabilitation became a vital part of management in COPD patients in form of activity modification, dietary and pharmacological optimisation. But access to traditional supervised aerobic (treadmill) walking is debatable fact due to economical and staffing expertise in developing countries like India. The investigators designed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of ground based walking over traditional treadmill walking in improving quality of life in COPD patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

PSG Hospitals

Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641004, India

About this study

Background: COPD is increasing mortality and morbidity globally. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a promising management in COPD management. Exercise training in form of aerobic (walking, cycling) and strength training is an important part of pulmonary rehabilitation. However access to traditional supervised exercise programs is questionable debate even in developed western countries. Unsupervised ground walk programs are often told by physicians but not properly prescribed.

Objective: To assess whether ground or treadmill walk is better in improving functional capacity and quality of life in COPD patients Design: Randomised controlled trial Procedure: Two arms 1) supervised ground walk training 2) supervised treadmill walk training. The intensity and progression of walk is based on 6 minute walk test. Quality of life will be gauged through Chronic respiratory questionnaire and functional capacity through 6 minute walk test.

Statistical analysis: Descriptive analysis for characterisation. Normality though Kolmogorov and Variables will be compared through paired and unpaired student t tests

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • stable COPD
  • Stage II - IV
  • Both genders

Exclusion criteria

  • Cardiovascular diseases uncompensated
  • uncompensated pleural diseases
  • uncompensated liver diseases
  • Recent surgeries less than 3 weeks
  • malignancy receiving chemo and radiotherapy
  • Recent exacerbations less than 3 months

Treatment and study plan

Ground walk training

Behavioral

3 times a week and 6 weeks

Supervised Treadmill Walk training

Behavioral

3 times a week and 6 weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Capacity (6 MINUTE WALK TEST)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

    6 minute walk test according to standardisation of ATS

  2. Quality of Life (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

    CRQ - interviewer based

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

PSG Hospitals

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Phase 0 Study of Comparison Between Ground Walk Training and Treadmill Walk Training in COPD Patients

Acronym: GWT/TWT

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Aug 18, 2014
Registry last updated
Oct 20, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.