Gsvm Medical College
Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
NCT Number: NCT07588412
This prospective interventional study compares the effectiveness of standard incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drain placement in the management of acute pyogenic breast abscess. Eighty patients were enrolled and allocated equally into two groups. The study evaluates outcomes including postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, wound healing time, number of dressings required, complications, and recurrence. The aim is to determine whether percutaneous suction drainage provides superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional surgical management.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
Acute breast abscess is a common surgical condition requiring prompt intervention. Conventional incision and drainage (I&D) has been the standard treatment; however, it is associated with increased pain, prolonged healing, and frequent dressings. Minimally invasive techniques such as percutaneous suction drainage (PSD) have emerged as alternatives with potential advantages.
This prospective comparative interventional study was conducted at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, from May 2025 to Feb 2026. Eighty patients diagnosed with acute pyogenic breast abscess were allocated into two groups: Group A (I&D) and Group B (PSD).
Outcomes assessed included postoperative pain (VAS score), duration of hospital stay, wound healing time, number of dressings, complications (residual abscess, fistula), and recurrence at 3 months. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of both treatment modalities.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Standard surgical incision and drainage of breast abscess with evacuation of pus.
Minimally invasive placement of suction catheter for drainage of breast abscess.
Time frame: Day 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90 post procedure
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a patient-reported pain assessment scale ranging from 0 to 10, where:
0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Pain scores will be recorded on postoperative Day 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, and Day 90 after the procedure.
Time frame: Within 30 days post-procedure
Total number of postoperative dressings required per patient in number
Time frame: Up to 15 days post-procedure
Length of hospital stay measured in days from procedure to discharge
Time frame: From procedure to complete wound healing (up to 30 days)
Time to complete wound healing, defined as the number of days from the procedure to full epithelialization of the wound with absence of discharge, assessed by clinical examination.
Time frame: Within 30 days post-procedure
Incidence of residual abscess, defined as the presence of a persistent or recurrent fluid collection at the original site confirmed by clinical examination and/or ultrasonography after the initial procedure.
Time frame: Within 30 days post-procedure
Incidence of fistula formation, defined as the development of a persistent abnormal tract with discharge from the wound site following the procedure, confirmed by clinical examination.
GSVM Medical College
Other
A Comparative Study of Management of Acute /Pyogenic Breast Abscess Using Standard Incision and Drainage Versus Percutaneous Suction Drainage
Acronym: I&D VS PSD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06634030
Surgical Wound, Wound Healing
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07255937
Arterial Leg Ulcer, Burns
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07633977
Infections, Neurologic Manifestations
Dhulikhel, Bagmati, Nepal
View Trial DetailsNCT07601919
Surgical Wound, Wounds and Injuries
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details