Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06757933

Comparison Of Spencer Technique And Isotonic Exercise In Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis

This study examines the efficacy of two forms of therapy for Adhesive Capsulitis, a condition characterized by stiffness, pain, and limited mobility in the shoulder joint. It is also commonly known as "Frozen Shoulder".

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

30 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dr. Saleem Memorial Free Hospital Address: College road, Depalpur Rd, adjacent baldia hall, Okara

Okāra, Punjab Province, Pakistan

About this study

Patients between the ages of 30 and 55 were randomly assigned to one of two groups for the trial held at the Saleem Free Hospital Okara and Dar-ul-Shifa Hospital. Group 2 engaged in isotonic exercises that emphasized concentric and eccentric motions of forward flexion and extension, whereas Group 1 was given the Spencer approach, which involved seven different movements. A goniometer and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale were used to measure the range of motion and pain. SPSS 20 was used to analyze the data and assess how well the treatments worked. The findings provided light on how well manual therapy and exercise compare in terms of reducing pain and increasing shoulder movement in people with adhesive capsulitis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both genders aged 30-55 years
  • Unilateral Adhesive Capsulitis
  • Pain lasting for more than one month
  • Capsular pattern of motion restriction
  • Diabetic patients were included.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants with rotator cuff tear
  • Rheumatoid and gouty arthritis
  • Tumors of the shoulder region
  • Peripheral nerve injuries
  • Shoulder girdle fracture and dislocation
  • History of shoulder surgery were excluded.

Treatment and study plan

The Spencer technique

Combination Product

The Spencer technique, which consists of seven different manual movements intended to increase shoulder mobility and lessen pain, was used to treat the participants in this group. The method seeks to improve blood flow, loosen up the shoulder joint and soft tissues, and reduce any tightness or impingement that is causing pain in the sub-acromial area. By re-establishing appropriate shoulder function and movement patterns, the Spencer approach is commonly used to treat disorders including adhesive capsulitis.

isotonic workouts

Combination Product

This group's members engaged in isotonic workouts that emphasized forward flexion and extension motions. Both concentric (shortening the muscle) and eccentric (lengthening the muscle) motions were used in these exercises. These exercises were designed to increase shoulder range of motion and strengthen the rotator cuff muscles. People with Adhesive Capsulitis may have less pain and have better shoulder function if they perform isotonic workouts, which increase muscular strength and stability.

Primary outcomes

  1. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Time frame: 12 Months

    (NPRS) was used to measure the subjects' level of pain. This scale helps measure the amount of pain alleviation attained with each intervention by allowing participants to rank their discomfort from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

  2. goniometer

    Time frame: 12 Months

    A goniometer, which measures the angle of joint movement, was used to measure the shoulder's range of motion (ROM). Improvements in shoulder mobility, which is frequently limited in adhesive capsulitis, were assessed with the aid of this assessment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Superior University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 3, 2025
Registry last updated
Jan 3, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.