University of Antwerp
Antwerp, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT07589998
This study investigates the accuracy, validity and reliability of smartphone-based 3D body scanning applications compared with traditional anthropometric measurements and a 4D stereophotogrammetry system.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Antwerp, Belgium
This study evaluates how accurately smartphone-based 3D body scanning applications can measure the human body compared with traditional anthropometric measurements and a 4D stereophotogrammetry system. Thirty-five healthy adults undergo body measurements using three methods: conventional tape and stadiometer measurements, smartphone-based 3D scanning applications (3D Measure Me and MeThreeSixty), and a 4D stereophotogrammetry scan used as a reference method.
The study examines the reliability, validity, and accuracy of these technologies by comparing measurements such as body lengths, circumferences, and body proportions across methods. The goal is to determine whether smartphone-based body scanning applications can provide clinically useful and accessible alternatives to traditional anthropometric measurements in healthcare and rehabilitation settings.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants undergo anthropometric assessment using three different measurement methods: traditional anthropometric measurements, smartphone-based 3D body scanning applications, and a 4D stereophotogrammetry system. Traditional measurements include the use of a measuring tape, stadiometer, and weight scale. Smartphone-based measurements are performed using the 3D Measure Me and MeThreeSixty applications on a smartphone device. The 4D stereophotogrammetry system is used as the reference scanning method to generate a full-body digital avatar. All measurements are collected during a single study visit to evaluate the validity, reliability, and accuracy of the different body measurement techniques in healthy adults.
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Length waist to floor (SIAS) in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Vertical length from waist to middle of knee cap in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Length from the top of the knee to the bottom of the foot in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Arm length from bone at top edge of shoulder to elbow to wrist just below wrist bone in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February
Length from back of heel to tip of longest toe in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Height from top of head to floor in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference around neck over Adams apple following natural curve in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference at widest point of bum from side view in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference at belly button in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference around chest beneath armpits and in line with nipples in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference just under bust in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Distance armpit to armpit straight across the back without going into the armpit in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference at largest point on forearm in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference just below wrist bone in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference measurement taken 1cm below the gluteal line or fold in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference around knee cap at the widest point in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference at the narrowest point of the ankle in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Bicep circumference at upper arm mid-point in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Loose or tight
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
light, medium or dark
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
no movement or slight movement
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Vertical distance from waist to abdomen in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Distance from base of neck down to the centre of the fullest part of bust in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Lenght from one end of a person's arms (measured at the middle fingertips) to the other when arms raised parallel to the ground at shoulder height at 90° angle in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Circumference from slightly above eyebrows above the ears and over the occipital prominence and the back of the head (with a bathing cap) in mm
Time frame: 10 and 16 February 2026
Length from the left armpit to the right armpit across the front in a straight line over the upper part and not through the centre in mm
Femke Van Orden
Other
Comparison of Smartphone-Based 3D Body Measurements With Traditional Anthropometry and 4D Stereophotogrammetry: Reliability, Validity, and Accuracy in Healthy Adults
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06951386
Anthropometry, Blood Pressure
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06464484
Anthropometry, Bowel Disease
Mecca, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT06285578
Anthropometry, Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT04860479
Anatomic Abnormality, Anatomic Landmarks
Bursa, Yıldırım, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details