Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00887471

Comparison of Sleep Study Results After Partial Intracapsular Tonsillectomy Versus Total Tonsillectomy

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate similar improvements in sleep-disordered breathing as determined by sleep study with microdebrider-assisted partial intracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy versus total Bovie electrocautery tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

6 month–14 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

SUNY Downstate Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, 11203, United States

About this study

Objectives: To demonstrate similar improvement in sleep-disordered breathing as determined by polysomnography (PSG) with microdebrider-assisted partial intracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (PITA) versus Bovie electrocautery complete tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A).

Methods: In a retrospective cohort study children found to have Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) by PSG who have undergone either PITA or T&A as treatment will be evaluated with repeat PSG. The groups will be matched by age, sex, and severity of pre-operative Apnea-Hypopnea Indices (AHI). The investigators performing and evaluating the PSG will be blinded to type of procedure and preoperative AHI. Change scores will be computed for each participant and the change scores of the groups compared.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The medical records of 149 children who underwent partial intracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy at the State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center or the Long Island College Hospital will be reviewed to identify children with positive preoperative polysomnography. 18 of those with positive preoperative studies will be randomly selected and offered participation in the study.
  • Once enrolled, the participants will be matched by age, sex, time since procedure and polysomnography results (Apnea Hypopnea Index Index within 5) to 18 children who underwent traditional tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (out of a total of 455 patients).

Exclusion criteria

  • Recurrent tonsillitis
  • Craniofacial syndromes
  • Neuromuscular disorders
  • Sickle cell disease

Treatment and study plan

PITA or T&A

Procedure

PITA - Microdebrider-assisted Partial Intracapsular Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy T&A - Bove Electrocautery Complete Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy

Other names: PITA = Partial Intracapsular Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy, T&A = Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Change in Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 years

    Change in the number of apneas plus hypopneas per hour of sleep on preoperative sleep study compared to postoperative sleep study, Change is calculated as baseline minus 4-year time point

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI) Less Than or Equal to 5

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 years

    Number of patients with postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (apneas plus hypopneas per hour of sleep) less than or equal to 5 on sleep study

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

State University of New York - Downstate Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Polysomnography Outcomes for Microdebrider-assisted Partial Intracapsular Tonsillectomy Versus Total Tonsillectomy

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2010
First posted
Apr 24, 2009
Registry last updated
Feb 10, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.