University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
NCT Number: NCT00321906
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two different anti-rejection drug regimens.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
This multicenter prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial compared the open label use of sirolimus with that of azathioprine in a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen. Eligible patients were identified during a 90-day screening period immediately after transplantation and randomized via a computer-generated scheme. Patient randomization was stratified according to center and rejection status in the first 90 days after transplantation. All patients received IL-2 receptor antagonist induction therapy, tacrolimus, azathioprine, and corticosteroids until 90 days after transplantation. At 90 days after transplantation, patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either continue azathioprine or change from azathioprine to sirolimus.
The dosing and levels of immunosuppressive medications were standardized for all patients included in this study. Tacrolimus was dosed at 0.04 mg/kg twice daily with target trough levels between 5 and 15 ng/ml, azathioprine was administered at 2 mg/kg daily with dose adjustments for leukopenia, sirolimus was initially dosed at 2 mg/day with target trough levels between 5 and 15 ng/ml, and prednisone was tapered to not more than 10 mg/day by 3 months after transplantation. All patients received induction therapy with either daclizumab or basiliximab as per the product package insert.
In addition, prophylactic antimicrobials were standardized among the participating sites. All patients with either donor and/or recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive serostatus received either intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir for a total of 90 days. Lung transplant recipients who were negative for both donor and recipient CMV serostatus received valacyclovir for 90 days. Antifungal prophylaxis was determined by each site. Pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis was continued throughout the study. Lipid-lowering medications were recommended according to the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
azathioprine 2mg/kg
sirolimus 2-4mg daily
Time frame: 12mos
Raw proportion of patients that experienced acute rejection at or before 12 months.
Time frame: 12 mos
Kaplan-Meier estimate of proportion of patients that had not experienced acute rejection by 12 months. Acute rejection is defined as rejection at any of the following grades.
Grade A0 - None With/Without Grade A1 - Minimal Grade A2 - Mild Grade A3 - Moderate
Time frame: 12 mos
Raw proportion of patients that experienced rejection at or above grade A2 by 12 months.
Grade A0 - None With/Without Grade A1 - Minimal Grade A2 - Mild Grade A3 - Moderate
Time frame: 24 mos
Kaplan-Meier estimate of proportion of patients that had not experienced BOS by 24 months.
Time frame: 36 mos
Kaplan-Meier estimate of proportion of patients that had not experienced BOS by 36 months.
Time frame: 12 mos
Kaplan-Meier estimate of proportion of patients that survived to (i.e., had not died by) 12 months.
Time frame: 24 mos
Kaplan-Meier estimate of proportion of patients that survived to (i.e., had not died by) 24 months.
Time frame: 36 mos
Kaplan-Meier estimate of proportion of patients that survived to (i.e., had not died by) 36 months.
University of Chicago
Other
Comparison of a Tacrolimus/Sirolimus/Prednisone Regimen Versus Tacrolimus/Azathioprine/Prednisone Immunosuppressive Regimen in Lung Transplantation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02727296
Acute Rejection (AR) of Transplanted Kidney, Delayed Graft Function
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06641622
Delayed Graft Function, Kidney Transplant; Complications
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03829488
Chronic Disease, Delayed Graft Function
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT05513807
Acute Kidney Injury, Delayed Graft Function
Paris, France
View Trial Details