Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03984279

Comparison of Sequential Fluoroscopy Guidance With Spiral Guidance in Terms of Safety, Effectiveness, Speed and Radiation in Interventional Chest-abdomen-pelvic Procedures

The purpose of the study was to compare sequential fluoroscopy guidance with spiral guidance in terms of safety (number of major complications), effectiveness (number of targets reached), speed (procedural time) and radiation (DLP) in interventional chest-abdomen-pelvic procedures.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Body Interventional procédures With CT

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Besançon, 25000, France

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients (> 18 years),
  • indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control

Exclusion criteria

  • MRI contra indication
  • persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code

Treatment and study plan

Patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control

Other

Not applicable, all patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control on a period of 1 year will be taken into account

Primary outcomes

  1. number of major complications

    Time frame: All patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control performed on a period of 1 year will be taken into account

    Comparison between the 2 groups

  2. number of targets reached

    Time frame: All patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control performed on a period of 1 year will be taken into account

    Comparison between the 2 groups

  3. Dose Length Product (DLP)

    Time frame: All patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control performed on a period of 1 year will be taken into account

    Comparison between the 2 groups

Secondary outcomes

  1. number of controls required to place the needle

    Time frame: All patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control performed on a period of 1 year will be taken into account

    Comparison between the 2 groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Study Was to Compare Sequential Fluoroscopy Guidance With Spiral Guidance in Terms of Safety (Number of Major Complications), Effectiveness (Number of Targets Reached), Speed (Procedural Time) and Radiation (DLP) in Interventional Chest-abdomen-pelvic Procedures.

Acronym: APIR-TDM

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jun 12, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 23, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.